cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35985472

Ooft, the prize is literally just a trophy, why would you cheat this? Skimming takes skill, but to win you surely need a healthy dose of luck too. Anyway, Easdale looks a fun place to visit

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Okay. So.

    Stupid question.

    Why don’t they do some like, synthetic, maybe stoneware, “stones” that are perfectly shaped for optimal performance. One, if they were all uniform in size and mass and mass distribution, it’d be a lot easier to spot a cheat. And two, if it’s optimized (or intentionally un-optomized) that removes some luck and puts the skill more center stage.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes, I understand that, the rule doesn’t make sense from a competitive point. I imagine there’d be somebody local that would happily supply something (fired clay, maybe,) at cost for an opportunity to sell stuff.

        Maybe it’s just a non-serious local event, and finding the rocks is half the fun.

        But really! lol.

    • parody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Why don’t they dope openly in the Olympics, maybe similar here

      Synthetic = cleanup needed after

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        stoneware is relatively environmentally benign as litter. It’s just clay that’s been fired (and maybe glazed, mind. but no need for that.) What makes it different from earthenware is that the type of clay used can be fired to a higher temperature, letting it fuse and turn glassy (without said glaze). terracotta pots, for example, are earthenware. something like that.

        If you wanted to get even more particular, I’m sure we could sinter some artificial shale or other sedimentary rock into a synthetic stone. “synthetic” here means artificially constructed, the materials could be little different than “natural” ones already in the environment. There’s probably clay deposits near by to justify that, too. (maybe not on the island, which was historically a slate quarry.) "

        the reason they don’t dope in the Olympics or any professional sport is because it’s dangerous to the body. if everyone used a rock designed to be identical, it wouldn’t be cheating, in the same way that good nutrition isn’t cheating in the Olympics.

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          Right?

          Field hockey and LaCrosse balls are all the same, have to meet a spec.

          Why not just make a spec stone, sell it, and license it with certification tests?

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            26 minutes ago

            I think it’s just not really in the spirit of the event. It’s not meant to be a completely serious athletic endeavour, it’s a bit of fun and fundraising. They’re getting 2,000 people of all ages on to a tiny island with a population of 61 to chuck some stones across a pond. There doesn’t seem to be a big cash prize or anything. There was a raffle to win a wheelbarrow described as doing “0-3 mph in 1 second”