For over a century, the automobile has represented freedom, power, and the thrill of mechanical mastery. The connection between driver, machine, and road defined what it meant to own and love a car. But in today’s digital era, a different trend is unfolding. Cars are no longer just machines designed to take us from point A to point B. Increasingly, they resemble something else entirely: smartphones on wheels.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    the automobile has represented freedom

    That’s a part I never understood.

    Cara are fucking expensive, they’re literally money drains. Unless you have that much money, you ainns having a car.

    In Europe, bot having a car generally nis perfectly fine, you still can go everywhere easily as that place hasn’t been turned into a cars-only paradise

    In the US, and countries that modelled themselves after it, you’re not going anywhere without a car. Public transit it shit at best and in many places completely absent. Want to try a bicycle? Good luck, you gotta mix in with the murder cars.

    Cars do not represent freedom, they’re the opposite

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The sad thing is ‘smartphone on wheels’ is a slur.

    Smartphones don’t have to be soulless and uniform and enshittified and subscription based and completely inaccessible and straight up anti-consumer/designed to fail, but here we are.


    I really hope Slate takes off though (and they make a nimble hatchback for their next chassis). It feels like the antithesis of all this.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      The simplicity of the Slate interior is fantastic. They developed a screenless touch screen that you can rotate without even looking at them. I wish I were in the market for this type of vehicle.

      Interior photo

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 minutes ago

        Yeah, that is so perfect.

        Imagine a sedan or hatchback. It would be light as a feather (in terms of curb weight) and still feel spacious being so ‘clean’ inside.

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If the state of open source phones are anything to judge by, we will have open source cars at some point, except the foot brake isn’t working yet, so you’ll have to use the hand brake for now. Cars and phones both take a lot of resources to develop, and maybe you’ll be able to “de-Stellantis” your car at some point instead of going fully open source, but judging by the recent steps Google has taken to weaken de-Googling, I’m not sure how long that would last either.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s nothing less than a war against property rights.

    They are pushing software into cars because they see copyright, and more specifically the DMCA anti-circumvention clause, as an excuse to retain their control over your property after they sell it to you. Rentiership is 100% of their goal, and providing useful functionality is nothing but an afterthought at best.

    “Subscriptions” to hardware you already own is entirely FRAUD and executives of companies that engage in it deserve long prison sentences.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    Both fit in the same category of unfortunately necessary and terrible goods…so the merger makes sense to me.

  • XiberKernel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I drive a Kia EV6, and love it. Kia pushes like 2 OTAs per year for updates and small bug fixes, but hasn’t rolled out any new features. They have a premium connectivity package, but nothing but remote bells and whistles are behind it.

    I use my phone for the infotainment via CarPlay.

    My phone acts like a phone, and my car acts like a car.

    Now, the reason I have an EV6? I was a happy Chevy Bolt owner looking for a newer vehicle and was eyeing the Equinox EV. I noped out as soon as they announced the Google partnership and decided to remove CarPlay and BYOD as a feature.

    The two things that will turn me off from a future purchase is lack of CarPlay, or paywalled “hardware” upgrades, like performance tweaks or locking out something installed like heated seats. Nope.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Sadly yes and they’re mainly taking the worst aspects. Normal built in features like heated seats as subscriptions, dropping smartphone integration for their own far inferior dogshit UI and features, and so on.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Volkswagen is so bad at this! They have phone connectivity but they bog down the infotainment with they’re own crap software. The GPS is so bad it slowes down the whole system. I will never use vw maps. Ever. Just stop!

      And Chevy just doesn’t have android auto on or apple play on their lower trim levels. But they do compensate by integrating Google maps at least.

      Kia is the best though. Minimal proprietary software. Plug your phone in and android auto automatically comes up.

  • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Some of these comments are the most elitist, contrarian bullshit I’ve ever heard.

    This article is about the positives and negatives of car connectivity, not how cool you are because you choose to ride a bike. You’re so cool because instead of choosing to not connect your phone to your car, you bought a rusty 07 Camry?

    I’m not the biggest fan of the choices these companies are making either, but if your 1997 Mazda 929 is a personality trait, it’s not much different from the ding dong who bought the Ram 3500 to showcase his peanut balls.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      Yeah, I completely agree.

      I drive old cars because they don’t spy on me and they’re inexpensive to own. I have an 07 hybrid and an 06 minivan. They’re only an expression of my personality to the extent that I don’t care about my car and need something to get from A-B. I don’t flaunt it, and I’ll probably replace it with an older EV because refilling gas is annoying for my dedicated commuter (the hybrid).

      I’d rather ride my bike, but my work is too far away (2 hours on transit, ~1.5 hybrid w/ bike, maybe 1 with a riced ebik, each way), and my reasons for sticking with my employer and not moving are more important than my preference for cycling.

      My mode of transportation is about utility, not expression of personality. I’d drive a truck if it made sense, I just haven’t found one that makes more sense than renting one the 2-3 times per year I need to haul something that doesn’t fit in my minivan.

      When I need to upgrade my car, I’ll find something sensible and maybe remove the parts I don’t like. It’s not a big deal.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Personally I think it is cool to not give money to anti-consumer companies, which I assume all car companies have become by now if they all have computers. Certainly they cannot forever resist the temptation to use the power they have over users when they control the software running on our hardware.

      • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t disagree with either of your points. However, I’m not edgy because I refuse to shop at Target. I’m saying these comments are a bit smug.

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      We’re not too far detached from that being reality already. There are several car brands that straight up block your entire infotainment system to show their own ads

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It looks like you’re trying to brake. You’ve used up this months braking quota. Breaking will be enabled again in two weeks. Please enter credit card details to upgrade your subscription to allow unlimited breaking*.

      *Fair use policy, limitations apply. Braking is not available on all roads. If you’re using the brake to often, an additional braking fee might be applied to your credit card for each use. Braking fee and subscriptions do not include mechanical wear, new parts or checks by a mechanic.

    • Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      IMO cars peaked around 2015

      Interiors looked really nice and you had analog dials etc. Wish some small screens, just enough.

      Today it’s just big plastic dashboard with cheap tablets stuck in them

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        My 2020 Crosstrek with a manual is pretty good. The only things on the little touchscreen is the radio, backup camera, and android or apple for navigation. Also it isn’t integrated into the whole car so it can be replaced with an aftermarket unit. It has none of the blind spot monitoring, lane assist etc. It’s a lot of fun to drive on back roads, although it could use just a little more power.