California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office said the governor was denied entry into a venue at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 21, after being invited to speak at the event due to “pressure” from the Trump administration.

Newsom had been scheduled to speak with Fortune at the USA House, Davos, a privately organized event, at the World Economic Forum, which has been recognized by the U.S. government as the nation’s headquarters in Davos.

  • blitzen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    ITT, idealists once again letting perfect be the enemy of good.

    It’s worked so well the past few elections.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      The Democrats have had nothing but people like Newsom since the 1980s but you think that’s the best course of action? He was invited there because he would only talk about cultural grievances and not the economic ones that the wealthy are currently causing.

      Nobody wants perfect. A neoliberal Democrat winning will just continue the kleptocracy while lying to us about it. Bill Clinton, Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are controlled opposition.

      Also, Ben Shapiro, the lying little shit ran circles around him on Newsom’s podcast. Made him seem like a weak bitch.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The Democrats have had nothing but people like Newsom since the 1980s but you think that’s the best course of action?

        Well, they won every popular vote except two, so don’t be so quick to throw out the baby with the bathwater

        • rafoix@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yes, Obama ran on hope, change and anti-war… A litera promised leftist revolution. What did we get? More centrists. Democrats lost over 1000 seats in state and federal offices. Bankers in charge of policing banks. George W Bush and his cronies walking free after years on criminal activity by his administration.

          Biden was just the result of the DNC and all of the centrists grouping together to defeat Bernie Sanders for the second time.

        • voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Because at the time of the general election all other options left of center right are effectively removed with no support from the democratic party. They basically haven’t even pretended to have a democratic primary since Obama in 2008, instead choosing to coronate whoever the super delegates choose, which has worked true wonders for the party /s. They’re already starting the motions to do this again with their next center right candidate in Newsom.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Well, they won every popular vote except two, so don’t be so quick to throw out the baby with the bathwater

          Why not run a charismatic candidate with popular policy and win the electoral college too?

          We’re not trying to tie one hand behind our backs to impress our dads, we should do what has the best chance of actually winning…

    • Akh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      He is not good, he even denied genocide in Gaza and protected billionaires

    • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Stop saying that bullshit nonsense. He is not “good”. We don’t demand perfection, we demand that these people don’t be genocidal right wing fascist light.

      I hate whatever pundit told you all to say “dont let perfect be the enemy of good.” It makes me feel like I’m talking to a bunch of programmed robots.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s a saying that isn’t new.

        I welcome critique if Newsom before the primaries. I love AOC and sanders and walz as much as anyone here, but until one of them is electable, we’re kinda stuck in this chicken or the egg problem here. Like it or not, and to be clear i do not, someone with true leftist bona fides isn’t yet electable in the US. The best we can hope for is someone who can listen and change their mind.

          • blitzen@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 hours ago

            As a voter in the primaries I go leftist. But if I’ve got money on the outcome, it’s someone like Newsom.

            • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Newsom is unelectable and will not beat Trump or a Trump surrogate in the next federal election, and will not do anything to fix what Trump has done if he does get elected. It doesn’t matter how much voter shaming you do. Understand this, please, for the love of God. I do not want my country to have to go to war against yours.

        • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          How many times do you guys have to lose against Trump before you realize that the candidates you’re backing aren’t electable? You haven’t even tried a candidate that is true bonafide leftist.

          Except mamdani. Who won his election.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          It’s not a saying, it’s a thought-terminating cliche used to shut down discussions by making your opponent seem “unreasonable” under any circumstance. For example, one could say “We should appreciate having Donald Trump as president because Hitler caused a lot more harm. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good” and be just as accurate as what you’re saying now.

          I love AOC and sanders and walz as much as anyone here, but until one of them is electable, we’re kinda stuck in this chicken or the egg problem here. Like it or not, and to be clear i do not, someone with true leftist bona fides isn’t yet electable in the US.

          What’s the scenario where they “become electable” in your mind, and what exactly is the path between here and there that involves electing more Bidens and Newsoms while being continuously told that anyone better is unelectable?

    • itistime@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      He is a corpocrate. A shill for the wealthy. He represents the white moderates.

      I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

      MLK advocated for some pretty radical changes to our society. Not just racial equality. We need the white moderates to lose their investments, or they won’t really help. They have too much to lose, they think maybe tomorrow would be more opportune.

      Same then, same now.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I actually agree with you. But experience tells me we’re too principled and undisciplined to support any candidate after the primaries.

        • one_step_behind@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I agree with that. Both voters and politicians share the blame for Trump being in office. Democrats fail to run good candidates, but voters refuse to have their voices heard in primaries as well as thinking that doing a “protest vote” in generals is useful.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I will support him as far as it supports positive movement. I will criticize him otherwise. Same with every neo-liberal before him, and will continue with every neo-liberal after him.

    • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The options have been rather poor, let’s all be honest here. This would work if we were talking about say, AOC. Newsom, however, is bad. Very bad.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Just hold on, any day now Lemmy will find a candidate so pure they can rally behind them.

      Any day now.

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Idealists are letting perfect be the enemy of the good but I don’t think that’s why Democrats underperformed. Neither Clinton nor Biden/Harris were idealists of this sort (despite some stuff Harris said but didn’t mean back in the 2020 primaries) and they didn’t lose elections because of a lack of support from the idealists. So IMO while the idealists aren’t helping, the very much non-idealistic institutions of the Democratic party which prioritize seniority within the party over electability are to blame.

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Clinton I don’t know. Harris did for sure (her less that “perfect” stance on Palestine). And Biden, the most centrist of the three, won. so, your point?

        • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          41 minutes ago

          Biden didn’t win because he ran a great campaign, though he did at least give some lip service in an attempt to bring the progressives in after the primary, he won because Trump was currently in office and his chaos and damage was undeniable and at the top of people’s minds.

          Instead of trying to parse out which of three centrist candidates was more centrist (not as obvious as you claim), there’s actually a simple pattern. Every one of those elections was won by the “change” candidate. As people get more and more ground down by the impacts of decades of neoliberalism draining wealth from the middle class, the non ideological segment of the electorate just keeps asking for “different from now”.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s worked so well the past few elections.

      The last few elections had historically unpopular, zero charisma candidates who all had policy positions so far right, they weren’t just to the right of the dem voter base, they were to the right of the average American…

      Acting like anyone more liberal than Ronald Reagan was the problem is actively harmful, be cause yelling out voters to shut up and vote blue no matter who won’t actually solve anything.

      And as we saw with Biden, at a certain point the absence of more harm isnt enough.

      We need someone “progressive” enough to actually try and implement a solution.

      Even the voting members of the DNC realized that a year ago…