• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      33 minutes ago

      Israel’s highest imports come from China, and exports to the U.S.

      If China wanted Israel to stop what they were doing, they would have said stop or we’ll stop allowing sales to Israel, and Israel would have sit and stayed, or gone under.

      Definitely a move in a good direction in my mind though

  • titanicx@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    So far China is batting a thousand this week. Earlier in the week they banned hidden car door handles for safety. Now they’re banning investment in a neo fascist society.

    • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They also executed some billionaires and pedophiles too. Nature is healing…

      • titanicx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        What do you mean they can’t invest in the USA? China I believe is one of the biggest debt holders of the United States. They have considered selling off some of that debt to further weaken the dollar, which I wouldn’t blame them considering everyone is at this point.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The best time to ban all new investment on Israel was 1947 (this one I can excuse on the account of China not existing). The second best time was 1967. The third best time was 1973. The fourth best time was during the intifadas. The fifth best time was 2023. The sixth best time is now.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just found this post after scrolling down from an article about the PRC banning those stupid retractable car door handles that Tesla started, so that’s at least two.

        • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          They also do much better than the USA at addressing homelessness and most provinces regularly raise their minimum wage tied to the cost of living. They also are the world leader in expansion of green energy and public transportation

        • Idreamofcheesy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          1 day ago

          Genuinely curious, is there something wrong with them, or are they just mad they can’t replicate it as nicely?

          • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            1 day ago

            Mostly because flush electronic door handles aren’t as safe or reliable as non-retractable handles. They fail more often than their mechanical counterparts, especially in emergencies like crashes and fire.

          • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 day ago

            Chinese EVs have a lot of friction entering new markets like EU so they can’t afford an obvious failure point that Pedon thinks he may get through with. They want to sell millions of cars and a possible scrutiny based on an arbitrary design decision is not a part they’d want in their plan. Being marked death traps, not by a model or manufacturer but as a producing country as a whole gonna hurt them a lot.

          • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            You know how normal handles are a pain to open if they ice over, because you have to pull really hard to break the ice? What if you just couldn’t open them at all because the tiny motor isn’t strong enough to give you something to grip?

            • DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              So we can start car engines with the push of a remote button, we can open car windows with remotes, but doors are an issue? Are we absolutely sure we’re evolving in the right direction?

              • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                If your windows don’t open, you don’t burn to death when the stored energy equivalent of a couple hundred sticks of dynamite under you catches fire. Doors should ABSOLUTELY be obvious, direct, mechanical and reliable, and it’s INSANE we even have to have this discussion in 2026. This is Engineering 101 stuff.

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          i just hate that is such a corrupt government, that people have no rights, that there’s a credit score that says if you’re allowed to own a home, that they can execute you in the streets, that they are trying to disappear ethnic minorities, no workers rights, no freedom of speech, their media is controlled by government cronnies, but enough talking about USA, what about big scary China?

  • wampus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m fairly sure they’re doing this for political/strategic reasons. I’m also annoyed that it’s the most principled stance we’ve seen from a major country yet, even if the motives are a bit murky. But I was glad to read that.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Well yeah, every state action done by every country is for political/strategic reasons. I think their motives are clear: 1) Help Palestine achieve liberation through passive aid; and 2) increase China’s clout on the world stage.

      • wampus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        China buys a shit ton of oil from Iran, which is coming under military attack from Israel seemingly regularly --Israel also had a hand in heightening civil unrest during recent riots (though iran’s regime is also brutal in its response – Israel openly admitted its agents were operating in the area during the unrest). China’s likely getting impacted by all the recent ‘shadow fleet’ oil tanker seizures. Israel is basically tied to the United States, a country that’s clearly antagonistic towards China. China also doesn’t really care that much about human rights / the welfare of individuals/people, as evidenced by things like the Uyghur situation.

        So the thought that they’re doing it to ‘help palestine achieve liberation through passive aid’ is, I think, a nonsense reason that gets trotted out for potential PR reasons, maybe. Increasing their clout, I’d say is a very minor motivator: I don’t know anyone who’d deny China is a major power.

        It’s a ‘generally good’ move they’re making for the people in that region, and for human dignity in general. But the reasons for taking this step, is not for the benefit of people in that region.

  • TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Some european or american user might be confused by the approach of the Chinese governement, but for most purposes a strong emphasis on the Chinese national culture and industry has been a pivot and a prerogative of the Chinese powers (going as back as the kingdoms) since the foundation of a central political insititution. In that regard the political and social culture of China are historically China-first. They essentially see the region as the center of the world. It’s in their name too. Trading globally is a tool for that principle too. Or do you think they wouldn’t prioritise their own area? They currently detain a third of new patents globally, for medical research alone, and it used to be next to none a few decades back.