• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’m unsure whether it would be cringe or clever if McDonalds went all in on the No Kings protest, claiming that they misunderstood the concept and thought it was against Burger King.

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    corporate success for companies as huge as McDonald’s or Coca-Cola rely on the broadest appeal. that means being politically agnostic. aligning with anyone would alienate at least some of their customer base and cost them tremendous amounts of money. so they just stay as neutral as possible.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This would be the most American thing possible.
    The success of the protests would be measured by how much profit they created.
    Businesses would buy fire insurance, then give Molotov cocktails to rioters in front of branch locations trying to unionize.
    Megaphone speeches would include messages from the sponsors.

  • Codpiece@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Surely that would have to be changed to “No Burger Kings”. Wouldn’t have the same impact.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Would you buy burgers from burger king if they sponsored people yelling outside abortion clinics?

    Sponsoing protests would be a great way to lose half your customers. You won’t make up for it by selling more burgers to the protesters sympathisers.

  • CrocodilloBombardino@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    because then they would be punished by the trump administration. he would have govt agencies cone up with reasons to investigate them, take away their tax breaks, etc.

    the point of a company is to make money, that’s it.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I question the sincerity but its grassroots and no one is looking for corpo sponsorship. They could anonymously donate if they want and its important to them.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You think any corporate board is gonna voluntarily paint a target on their back like that?

    Or: look at the currently unfolding ramifications of Anthropic telling the pentagon to piss up a rope when they tried to order Anthropic to remove all the guardrails from Claude.