• kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I actually don’t know why people get so hung up on this. When you are making energy it’s easiest to make heat, and boiling water through a turbine is a really efficient way to turn heat into motion and we’re really good at doing it and turning motion into electricity. The fact that multiple ways of making heat exist is not surprising, the fact that different methods of making heat use the same, most efficient, well understood method for turning heat into electricity is even less surprising.

    If we develop a more efficient way to turn heat into electricity it won’t be “a new way to make energy” it will be “a new more efficient heat engine”

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Because it feels archaic and inefficient, maybe?

      We also have developed solar panels, wind turbines, hydro-electric dams as well as tidal/wave energy devices in the intervening years - so adding another method to boil water just feels “outdated”.

      I’m not trying to cast judgement myself, just trying to explain that it feels like it’s just “vibes based”.

      • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Take a look at a modern supercritical steam turbine, this thing can run on 600C steam. there’s nothing archaic about it (it can be more efficient as a part of combined cycle)

        Hydropower and windmills are older than steam

      • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I had an idea for a dumb Star Trek meme, based on the episode where they explain how Romulan warp drives work, but extrapolating that to “it boils water and spins a turbine”. Maybe one of the Star Trek memers can take this and run with it?

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The idea …

    Send water on a 150 million kilometer pipeline to the sun to super heat it … then pipe the steam back to power a turbine

  • frank@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m an EE by schooling and I’ve worked in both gas turbine and wind power. Photovoltaics blow my fucking mind. Everything else is just spinning magnets to extract power. PVs are insanely cool

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Personally, I like the mirror plants that use the suns energy to superheat salt.

      And then use that to boil water. /s

      For real, what China is doing with PVs is pretty fucking cool.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Take a look at reverse electro-dialysis.

      It’s pushing thermal energy into electricity directly by the force of entropy.

      • frank@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah, it’s a super rad tech! A bit pricey but a neat renewable that almost generates opposite to solar in a way, in that if it’s raining you’re getting some energy in the form of fresh water

        Can you ELI10 an intuitive explanation on why the salinity gradient provides energy? It doesn’t make intuitive sense to me and never has. Like why is fresh water mixing with salt water energy positive?

        • rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          when you dissolve salt in water, then salt splits into ions and each can hold up specific number of water molecules, which means that this water can’t do water things. so on top of salt’s physical presence, there’s a fraction of water that can’t water, or salt water is less watery in a sense than fresh water. now it turns out, if you put a membrane between these two that allows water through but not salt, water goes to higher salinity on its own, because it’s less watery there. how hard it happens is quantified as osmotic pressure and it can be in tens of atmospheres. reverse electrodialysis is just a clever arrangement that avoids energy recovery from low volume of high pressure liquid, like how reverse of reverse osmosis would work

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          why the salinity gradient provides energy?

          It doesn’t. It’s the thermal energy that is converted to electricity.

          The salinity gradient provides an entropy dump. The dialysis machine is built in a way that the only possible way for that entropy to increase is by generating some electricity.

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Entropy is maximized by turning heat into electricity, so electricity appears on the device, as it gets cooler (by a tiny amount).

          EDIT: I just noticed that you may be asking about the “reverse electro-dialysis” part :)

          It’s a process where fresh and salty water enter a machine, and they get mixed while generating electricity. It’s the reverse of this:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrodialysis

          That runs on the same conceptual machine.

          (And oh, looks like it’s written together.)

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Your name makes me think you’re about to lather your own naked body in vasoline, and hide inside the couch.

      • 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        22 hours ago

        No, wind is spinning magnets. Everything except photovoltaics and fuel cells is spinning magnets. (Everything with boiling water is also spinning magnets)

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          There’s peltier devices, too, which use heat traveling via different metals and maybe some sort of sorcery to generate a voltage.

          Also teslacoils use a different mechanism (friction I believe), though that’s a static voltage.

          In theory, you could translate a magnet through a coil instead of just rotating it to produce a current. Lol spinning a ring magnet through a rounded coil could be a different way of using spinning magnets (assuming it isn’t already done).

          • 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Well… if a wire moves in a magnetic field, a current is induced. If a current runs through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field.

            So in this case: spinning wire = spinning magnet

        • autriyo@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          We’re kinda just using magnets to push around other magnets remotely.

          And then there’s other stuff attached to those magnets.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The new supercritical CO2 generators are pretty cool. Pretty much the same thing but no water!

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Those systems are interesting, but also nightmares to build and maintain.

      Supercritical co2 is a powerful solvent and can corrode most metals.this problem is worse when you increase the temperature.

      Material scientists are working on it, but so far, the few test systems that have been built can’t quite live up to the hype.

        • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          yeah but its waaay less efficient than a turbine. the only reason to use internal combustion is because its cheaper and better able to handle variable rotation rates. grid scale power generation will always favor efficiency over initial cost, at least to a point, and a generator is preferred to spin at one speed anyway.