• jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What we really should have done is made the Car Talk guys president. If there’s one thing I know for sure, it’s that those two would never have forced me to listen to what some MIT grad thinks.

    Absolute gold! (The hosts of Car Talk were both MIT grads)

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I like to think, despite the title, someone’s gonna read this like"Yeah! Fuck EVs!" and post it on their Facebook. It’ll be the exact person portrayed by the writer too.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I’m disappointed that the article doesn’t address the ecological and social externalities footprint of the electronics and rare metals (lithium, copper, etc).

    I’m not in Facebook, but I do live in South America. A lot of my not engineering friends would rather buy ICE cars than electric because of the harm they see that copper and lithium mines are doing to the environment here.

    I wish I had something concrete and quantitative to point to that addressed those concerns.

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      rare metals (lithium, copper, etc)

      It’s important to remember that these metals need to be mined once, and will last the entire life of the vehicle, likely several lifetimes, as the battery materials can be recycled. Contrast that with ICE vehicles, which require more fossil fuels every time the vehicle is used.

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        No one talks about how much mining is used to make platinum, palladium and rhodium used to make catalytic converters. Those metals are actually rare.

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I believe that’s theoretical hopium. Recycling battery lithium components is academic.

        And we know how terrible the process of recycling lead acid is on the environment, so we’ll just have to see if its even possible in practice, and how bad it is.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Lead acid recycling is 99% efficient. Very little new lead is used in new batteries.

          Lithium recycling plants are online already.

    • Sunshine@piefed.caOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      EVs are also causing more tire particles due to the batteries making the vehicles heavier.

      But it’s nice that Brazil has a high amount of renewable energy output solidifying energy independence for their transport.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        EVs but not SUVs and trucks, right? What matters here is the powertrain, not the weight, right? No one ever mentioned tire particles when heavier SUVs became more popular than lighter cars.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I’m gonna guess that most F-150 drivers don’t even know that microplastics exist and don’t give a shit about pollution.

          But also, you can still make the biogas trucks worse if you make them even heavier than they already are.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I also wish proponents of EVs could stop pretending that in some cases an ICE vehicle isnt more convenient. For 95% of people 95% of the time the EV wins but the edge cases do exist.

      When people argue that there are no exceptions to the rule when there clearly are I do wonder what other half truths they are telling.

      • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        A lifestyle that depends on a gasoline vehicle is something you can probably look for.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I have experienced the reality behind this comment so deeply in the past year.

          I have been building a lot of stuff recently, and in 2026 alone I have made several large Home Depot lumber runs.

          It’s always me in my old shorts & t-shirt, loading like 2 dozen 2x4s or 4x4s or plywood into either my little mazda3 sedan or the family SUV my wife drives that has a mix of “cute” and “sassy feminist” stickers all over the back. All around me are trumpy-looking chuds in their pristine business casual work clothes carrying a single little bag or mailbox post to their also-pristine emotional support trucks.

          And I’m not faulting them generally for clean clothes and nice cars. I’m a software engineer with a desk job, and I am way overdue for a fun new car that won’t even fit lumber. But I am way way way over the stupid culture in this country where having a good job makes one a valid human and having a big vroom vroom truck makes one a legit rugged big strong boy.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s fair to base a global discussion about the habits and needs of 95% of us.

        Yes there will always be edge cases, but shut the fuck up. We know about them.