How easy would it be to shutdown “alligator alcatraz”?

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      As annoying as it is, you’re not wrong. Donald has demonstrated that the president can effectively rule by fiat, provided they’re willing to fight for whatever it is they ordered, up to and including tanking the campaigns of people in their own party. (Which Democrats have never shown a willingness to do, unless you’re a socialist.)

      In order to create LASTING change, ideally, one needs Congress. That said, so much power is now invested in the presidency that you don’t really need Congress for much.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Part of the problem is that you have a complicit Congress and Supreme Court. However, since the majority of Congress is the President’s Party, Trump can operate in a vacuum and Congress won’t push back. It also turns out that the people concerned about Supreme Court nominees were right.

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    16 hours ago

    just shut it down, ICE work for you and the Supreme Court has given you complete immunity.

  • hyperion626@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well personally I’d create some kind of review board to identify who probably shouldn’t be let go. I would be surprised if the net hasn’t caught people who best not be walking our streets. Otherwise IMO, any deaths caused by the person after you let them go is on you for facilitating their release into the public.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying they are largely bad people, but blanket releases are stupid and dangerous. Expedience is key though so forming that board and getting them whatever they need would be high priority since every day they are detained is another day their family is without them.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The president of the US is the head of the federal executive branch. Anything done by the executive branch, you could undo, including release people detained by the executive branch. I don’t know enough details about which illegally detained people you’re referring to to answer the question more completely.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It’s more complicated than that; they’ve shifted from domestic concentration camps to foreign concentration camps — so the first thing you’d have to deal with is international diplomacy.

    • kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You could divert a tiny fraction of military spending into bribes investments for these foreign countries.

      Also an important step after getting everyone home would be ruthlessly punishing anyone even slightly responsible. Otherwise you’re going to get the same shit all over again.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The worst part is that there are no records of some of this. We don’t know where some of these people have been taken.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If you’re a Democrat you MUST go Throw Congress and Courts and Public Perception! If you’re a REPUBLICAN you can Literally do WHATEVER you Want!

  • Eq0@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Just a pedantic statement: you are posting on a world wide platform. As least, refer to which country you are talking about when asking the question. I know it’s clear from context, but it’s off-putting for all the others that are not in the US.

    Edit: on one hand, I want to apologize, I definitely came in too strong and was a bit of a duche. Sorry. On the other, I am amused at the visceral reaction I got.