• ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It took them so long I no longer care tbh. I got used to inkscape and scribus. Scribus would be the two of those I would stop using first if I do switch back

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Too little too late. I advocated for a Linux version for years, and now with Krita, Graphite, etc. the need is no more.

    • Kagu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I use affinity on windows to make photo books as a hobby. Scribus - the only Linux native FOSS alternative I’ve found - is stuck with the typical FOSS issues of a terrible UI, lack of modern snapping or photo importing features, and an overall lack of polish.

      Do you know of any affinity alternatives for the layout tools?

      • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No sorry I don’t. Publishing is still one of those areas where open source tools are super lacking. Graphite aims to become a capable publishing tool though, and it’s developing quite fast, so let’s see what comes of it in a year or two. Right now it’s a very capable procedural vector graphics editor. See the “nodevember” livestreams : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iLiaSGSnPs

        Sorry I can’t help more.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They will. But so will everyone else.

      We’re going to win by losing many small battles.

  • thejml@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    As someone who does photography as a hobby/side hustle I’ll say, though it’s not FOSS, it was a SOLID Adobe Creative Suite replacement. You could actually just buy once and own forever instead of all the other subscription based creative software out there.

    Then Canva bought them, said “It’s free!*” and its gone downhill ever since. Luckily I can still use what I bought, because not subscription, but definitely not what it used to be.

    • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ve only used it since it went free, and I think it’s great! What’s bad/worse about it now?

          • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You do need to be connected to the internet however, otherwise it stops working after a few minutes

            • Carrot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              This isn’t true. In the FAQ on their download page, they explicitly mention that you only need to be online during initial download and installation, then you are free to be offline, either perpetually or for up to 30 days. Its hard to know which because the wording isn’t consistent across official sources. There are features that won’t work without an internet connection, but they are things that actually require an internet connection like stock photos and their AI. Why do you talk authoritatively about something you don’t know anything about?

              https://www.affinity.studio/download

              • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                It is true. It’s been tested by folks on the blenderartists forum if my memory serves right. Unless that changed of course, that was around the time of the initial release. I’m not confident on the timing though, I remember it being minutes, but it could be hours, anyway it was a short time. It doesn’t need to stay a mystery either, anyone can try it, provided they’re ready to unplug the internet for enough time, or put Affinity behind a firewall I suppose. I have had a stable enough connection ever since I signed up for starlink, but before ? that would have been a dealbreaker. Companies from the developed world forget that the entire world isn’t always up to their infrastructural standard. It’s also a problem on principle, I think : what are they doing that needs an internet connection ? None of my design programs do this and they work perfectly.

              • moth@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                if their wording isn’t consistent, wouldn’t that mean nobody can speak with authority?

                • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Surely the tons of people who use the software have more authority on the matter than someone who doesn’t. Besides, you shouldn’t need a trusted authority to tell you that online features require an internet connection.

                  The wording is clear, Affinity is free, the license is perpetual, but you need to have an internet connection to get updates

                • Carrot@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Yeah, other than directly contacting Affinity, we won’t know which case is correct. However, the one thing we can say for certain is that the credential refresh timer is not on the scale of minutes. From anecdotes in the official forums, it’s pretty clear that it is at least a 30 day refresh timer, though some people report it never needing to be refreshed

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    That’s actually really awesome news. I’ve been using Linux since 2008, and I’ve never seen companies so pressured to have Linux support. Companies that have never given a shit are now seeing missing dollar signs. That’s big.

    • SomGye@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s a suite of programs that’s fairly similar to Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom (and another one I’m forgetting)

          • reev@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Unless I’ve missed something, it’s actually Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign, not Lightroom.

            • Exec@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Now I’m sad. I would pay money for a good photo editor on Linux. No, Darktable is a sorry excuse, Rawtherapee is something I’m putting up with because it’s free.

            • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Yeah, this is correct.

              • InDesign - page layout
              • Illustrator - vector design
              • Photoshop - raster image editing (but has smart layers that can contain vector shapes)

              Source: I was a graphic artist for ages and my first version of Photoshop was 5.0.

    • Helix 🧬@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Every year since 1994, where XFree86 provided the first GUI, was the year of the Linux desktop!

      Let’s celebrate 33 years of the Linux desktop in 2027! 🥳

      • vas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Yes, that’s the best way to look at it! :)

        Come to think of it, I’ve been using Linux since about 2006. So I guess I’ll celebrate 20 years of Linux on my Desktop :)

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Good news. I think they might struggle a bit with the ArtCraft stuff in development.

    • hperrin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’d much rather use a paid software that was written by people than a free software that was written by clankers.

        • hperrin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Adobe’s subscription prices aren’t that much if you consider them a business expense. They’re cheaper than an ISP. It’s not the prices that make Adobe shit, it’s the practices.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The fact that this is downvoted is really frustrating, as a software engineer. Expensive software pays the bills for the developers who make it. When that software is for professionals, they generally don’t mind the expense.

            The things that make Adobe shitty have nothing to do with how pricey the software is. Adobe has shit business practices, they’re anti-competitive, and they use dark patterns and deceptive, borderline illegal terms to exploit their users. That is why you should hate them.

            It would be super great if all software could be free, but then people like me wouldn’t be able to afford rent. If you’ve ever donated to an open source project, kindly disregard this, you are awesome.

    • anguo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I tried ArtCraft and found it completely unusable. There is weird jank everywhere. Brush cursor turning square, weird shenanigans when typing… It looks impressive, but it’s still AI slop.

      • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        try it again. it’s evolving fast

        first time i tried, it was useless. I tried again, 2 weeks later, after chris titus made a video about it and it worked fine.

  • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m excited because I’ve found vector tools for Linux to be really lackluster so far, and end up reaching for Affinity via Wine, and that clunk, for vector work.

    Inkscape I know is a darling thing but like, actually using it? It’s an SVG editor at core, and that’s fundamentally different from “vector editing”, because “vector” is a concept, and “SVG” is a rigidly-defined format. In other words, if it’d be a valid vector operation but not supported by SVG, you (often) can’t do it in Inkscape. It also bounds objects with a manipulator that doesn’t follow the object shape/position, but instead the SVG bounding box for that object. So if you have a long box shape and rotate it diagonally, your bounding box is defined by the most distant X/Y coordinates that would fully surround it in a horizontal/vertical box, instead of being the object itself like all other vector editors do. And that shows something I can’t simply fix with a feature request because it’s part of the fundamental design of Inkscape – that’s way bigger than a feature request.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This is genuinely good news for me. I’ve been using Darktable for the last couple of years. This could add a valuable work and production flow.