Modlog: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog/25693?page=1&actionType=All&userId=21053985 , banned by @goat@sh.itjust.works

For context, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, and got into a few arguments.

More context:

It started (to my knowledge) with this comment, goat pinged db0 after he downvoted a comment

a note on the uyghurs (click to show

For the record, I believe that the Uyghurs are mistreated by the CCP, and are experiencing cultural erasure and Human Rights abuses, but there’s a lack of evidence that it’s a genocide specifically (especially since it seems to target the religion, rather than the ethnic group).

Goat banned IndustryStandard, leading to this thread: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/ leading to goat commenting this:
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52160152/21070262

He mentions this:

We constantly encounter bots, spammers, alt accounts, trolls, and doxxers, so I need to be vigilant by regularly checking who’s interfering and from where.

Which I find ironic, since there was some vote manipulation happening, which goat did nothing about (and could be behind), but I’ll get to that later.

After some more arguments, goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, saying that letting tankie users engage on dbzer0 comms means other users are tankies:


source

He said that it’s different for LW (lemmy.world) and SJW (sh.itjust.works, not the other word). He then poster the “Tank Man” picture to !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com, as he expected us to retaliate (being tankies, according to him). We did not, in fact, retaliate: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21089819

He also posted this in tankiejerk: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/52268655, https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20733015.

He also may have done vote manipulation, and at the very least allowed it.
Take, for example, this comment: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/21091723
Per lemvotes, it was downvoted by the following users:

The relevant ones here are:

They have all downvoted exclusively arguments against goat and others, and were made almost at the same time.

After a bit more arguing (I’m not posting the specific comments because it’s tedious, and they’re easy to see by scrolling through goat’s profile.) goat decided to ban all dbzer0 users from meanwhileongrad, I think this comment marks when he decided to do this, but I may be wrong.

note on the post that comment was in reply to

I think this reply (by unruffled) was taken out of context. Unruffled is absolutely not defending what’s happening to the Uyghurs, they’re saying that a lot of people have a double standard, where they will not hesitate to condemn the Uyghur genocide, but hesitate on the gaza one, especially when the gaza one is more severe and urgent. To quote them directly:

Yes, that’s exactly what I was saying but of course they misrepresented it. You know exactly what Americans are like. They couldn’t give a shit about the uyghurs, except as a way to China bash and feel superior. I also explicitly said later in the comments I agreed it was a genocide. They’re just doin’ the usual bad faith takes.

Feel free to quote me lol

Since this goat had been banned from dbzer0 for being hostile: https://sh.itjust.works/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=63615

  • Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    and are experiencing cultural erasure and Human Rights abuses

    If you believe that, then you believe there is a genocide. Because cultural erasure is genocide.

      • Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The definition of genocide by the UN convention:

        In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

        (a) Killing members of the group;

        (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

        © Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

        (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

        (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

        If the target is to destroy a group as a group and any of these acts are committed, it is genocide. Mass murder is the “prevalent” act, but it is not a requirement for genocide.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And yet the UN and ICJ don’t call it genocide.

          That’s because there is no evidence of intent to destroy their ethnic group. That’s why mass murder is basically necessary, because that’s what shows intent. Transferring children to different families can be done without intent, I’m sure you can imagine situations where someone has their children taken that are unrelated to genocide? I know I can.

          • Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The ICJ is a court and as such slow. As for statements showing intent, there is a plethora of statements, from comparing Palestinians to biblical “Amalek” (Netanyahu), over saying it is “unfortunate” that the world won’t let Israel just starve all people in Gaza to death (Ben Gvir) to public broadcast employees saying they want to commit another Holocaust in Gaza.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The fact that so many of these are empty and stupid anti-communist smears is fascinating. Vietnam did genocide against South Vietnam, collectivization of farmland in the USSR was genocide against land owning peasants? Really?

          Deeply unserious, to the point of actually being genocide denial. Genocide is the crime of crimes. This “cultural genocide” invention actually equivocates the crimes of the worst regimes in history with what are, ultimately, not even crimes. Look at Xinjiang province and compare it to Gaza. It’s fucking night and day.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            This “cultural genocide” invention

            It was “invented” in the very same book that coined the term genocide. Cultural genocide has been a part of genocide since the very inception of the concept of genocide. I shouldn’t have to explain that multiple things can fit in the same category without being equal. Playing whataboutism games as an excuse to deny ongoing genocides is a supremely bad look.

            We’re more than happy (at least those of us on the left) to admit Australia’s “stolen generation” was an act of genocide. I’m not as well-informed about it, but my understanding is that Canada’s “residential school system” has been even more widely recognised as such. The concept of cultural genocide is pretty well established and widely accepted in leftist circles. The only exception to this seems to be tankies trying to deny China’s own examples of it in Tibet and Xinjiang.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              The stolen generation, the residential schools, these don’t exist in a vacuum. Canada and Australia ran extermination campaigns to reduce populations before they started taking children. They’re genocidal because they’re part of a broader campaign of genocide, you can’t just divorce them from the broader genocide as a separate crime.

              That’s what I mean when I say cultural genocide has always worked alongside ethnic cleansing and mass murder campaigns and extermination. They’re not separate things. Divorcing it from them as it’s own unique crime of “cultural genocide” makes no sense and essentially devalues the power of genocide accusations.

              • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                “Actually nuh uh, because, you see, I said so”

                How profound. Do you have anything of value to say, or are you too belligerent to unconditionally repudiate your wrongness and humble yourself?

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The genocide convention doesn’t actually cover this. The threshold for the crime of genocide is high, it is the crime of crimes. “Cultural genocide” in the absence of extermination/mass murder/ethnic cleansing does not meet that threshold.

                  It’s not just me that says so, the UN says so. The ICJ says so. They don’t call it genocide because it isn’t genocide.

              • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Let’s try a hypothetical then. Without any mass murder or extermination campaigns, if a group forcibly enacted birth control on another group, would that be genocide? How about taking all children of that group and raising them outside of their ethnic background, therefore forcibly erasing their cultural and ethnic identity? How would those differ from other acts that don’t involve direct violence, like starvation campaigns? I agree with you on the point that using the term "cultural genocide"does devalue it though, but I just also personally believe that anything that seeks to erase a cultural, ethnic or other identity is genocide.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Oh yay, the tankie supreme has joined the conversation. To share…a link to a search page? The irony of thinking a Lemmy search page is a useful link, in a comment that criticises Wikipedia.

  • Chad~McTruth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    PLEASE DELETE THIS POST IMMEDIATELY OR I WILL CONTACT THE AUTHORITIES

    GDNW

    THAT STANDS FOR GOAT DID NOTHING WRONG

    STAND STRONG GOAT I LOVE YOU

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Db0 is a bit of a power tripper NGL. He is very accepting of everyone’s beliefs as long as they don’t contradict his own.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Don’t involve me here. I haven’t even done anything in this drama cycle. You just have an ax to grind against me.

          • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m a bit confused about who Lemmydb0 federates with, why is hexbear ok but that instance not? I thought they shared users when hexbear almost went down.

            (for context I have only used lemmy.world and shitjustworks, both of which defederate with both instances. I’m not really knowledge about anything regarding the specifics.)

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Hilarious Chaos is a Nazi instance, not anywhere close to Hexbear. The closest instance to Hexbear is Lemmygrad.ml, because both Hex and Grad have the most Marxist-Leninists.

              dbzer0 is federated with Hex because Hex is also an anarchist instance, Hex is federated with dbzer0 and Lemmygrad.ml, and to my knowledge none of these three are federated with HilariousChaos

  • keepcarrot [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    goat started calling dbzer0 users tankies, saying that letting tankie users engage on dbzer0 comms means other users are tankies

    Tankie used to mean something, damn it!

    • Red Army Dog Cooper@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean not really, it was always used as a pejoritive, similar to Commie or Pinko, and it has not so subtly been moving to encompase more and more. Even at the start it was used to disreguard anyone who was too “Left wing” so this was an enevitable conclusion of the term

      • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        In the 1950s, in the UK, “Tankie” was used as perjorative among members of the Communist Party of Great Britain, to describe those in the party who supported the Soviet invasion of Hungary.

        The term has been so warped that now the people who coined it would also be considered Tankies by the liberals who love to throw the word around

  • dbtng@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Whatever man. irrelephant, you are pretty free with your own mod activities, don’t respond when questioned, and basically don’t discuss what you do. So why would anyone care if you don’t like some shit? Why talk to you about it, when you won’t talk about the shit you do as a mod?

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s almost like the Lemmy mod structure promotes authoritarian abuse and is extremely flawed. I feel like more leftists should understand it’s more about the systems than the individuals.

      • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re not wrong, but in this case they were complaining about me removing this post (which I restored, because why not), and not answering DMs they sent, which I did not receive.
        I didn’t even ban the person.

        • dbtng@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well no. I banned you.

          I was the last poster in your old comm, and the first one in the new comm after your migration. Whether you even realized it, that’s what you lose when you don’t communicate.

          And I stopped posting after our encounter.

          I’ll now contribute there again. Because, why not?

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Haha OK it was a broader point: I’ve never seen or heard anything about your modding so I know nothing. But it is a common issue both on Reddit and here. The issue is that there is no structure to provide users with actual power to influence their communities other than voting on content. And moderation supersedes this power.

      • dbtng@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Just look in your chat log. I’ve a pretty unique nic, as do you.
        But you don’t respond to public questions in your comms either.

          • dbtng@eviltoast.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I guess my instance purges old direct messages? I had no idea they went away after a time. I don’t have it either.

            Ya took down my silly cat pic in that dead-ass iiitttttt com. Off topic. Didn’t reply to me.
            It’s old news. I just said screw you and stopped posting to your comm.

              • dbtng@eviltoast.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I dd not agree. You did not reply. And not replying seems to be your default in public as well.

                Like, you moved the comm to another instance. There was a lot of subsequent discussion of that. People wanted to know what the comm was even about. Thats about the time you nuked my cat pic. No - comment.

                You seemed to be mining the old comm and recycling content. Nope, you had no comment.

                I have no issue in general with you or your comm. I still read it.
                But its fun watching you whine about another mod.

                • irelephant [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The comm isn’t mine, I just mod it. I try to reply to stuff, but I can miss things (like that DM).
                  I’m pretty sure I explained the comm to most people who asked about it.
                  I restored the cat picture, but I think it should have been left removed.

  • Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hmm quite the spicy thread you have here. May I taste?

    Hmm honestly a bit too elaborate, seems like I need a PhD in lemmy to follow all the ramifications…

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yep, the second the anarchists weren’t in 100% lock-step with the cryptofascists, the cryptofash started lumping in the anarchists with the Marxists as “tankies.” I called this a long time ago.

  • Flinch [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    huh, turns out having a vague, poorly defined label anyone could use to deride and write someone off as a pinko commie at a moment’s notice was a bad idea, who could’ve possibly seen this coming shocked-pikachu

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Two notes on your Uighurs note:

    1- You can absolutely have religion-based genocide. Our old friend ISIS has one under its belt.

    2- The Uighurs are absolutely being targeted for their ethnicity. I mean, even the official excuse is Uighur separatism. That’s why characteristics of Uighur culture and language unrelated to religion are also being targeted. It’s also why the other Muslim groups in China (and there are many of them; Uighurs aren’t even the largest Muslim ethnic group in China) aren’t targeted like the Uighurs are. The goal is to make Turkic peoples in Xinjiang either cease to matter or cease to exist; the fact that those groups tend to be majority Muslim is a geographical coincidence.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The goal is to make Turkic peoples in Xinjiang either cease to matter or cease to exist;

      Of course, because of Jason Bourne and the Han Supremacy. As we know from the features of the Mongoloid brain pan, Han Chinese are ruthless, devious, and have little regard for human life.

      This shit is just wypipo projecting their 500 years of racist, imperialist, genocidal history onto their perceived enemy today. It’s re-warmed orientalism for the new cold war. Uyghurs have lived there for centuries, but now all of a sudden the Han want to wipe them from existence, because… what? They woke up on the wrong side of the bed at the turn of the millennium?

      Why would people of a millennia-long multi-ethnic culture, whose standard of living has been steadily improving over the last several decades with no sign of stopping, want to go on a genocidal rampage?

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nobody said this was something the people wanted to do. It’s said to be what the authorities thought are the most effective measures for countering terrorism.

        • davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yes, people have said it. You can find plenty of talk about “Han supremacy” in articles and from people online, including Lemmy.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Fine, nobody here. You can also find plenty of talk conflating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism in the same amount of articles and people online.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think almost everyone involved in this drama is being extremely rude and unreasonable and needs to take a break from Lemmy for a bit. But yeah this is obviously petty and ridiculous.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      To me it’s yet another example of why we need private voting or this place is just going to eat itself alive. I’ve already basically stopped voting because of this new vote drama trend.

          • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            How can you say they don’t matter when you have a strong position on them and the importance of how they’re implemented?

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It does dictate what people see first. It’s easy to bury a subject with a few bots.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve been watching this drama with great amusement.

    It seems like goat is trolling an entire instance and I think that’s just the bee’s knees.

    Not that I have a problem with db0 I think you guys are cool and aren’t HilariousChaos which is cool too.

  • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago
    1. Trying to wipe out a religion (and not a specific religious belief) is cultural genocide
    2. Db0 is a shithead
    3. The db0 admins ban users for voting, and I believe in holding people to their own standards, so goat confronting db0 for voting is fine in my book
    4. Just move instance if you don’t like the consequences of using db0