• ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Some computer scientists really went “we made a computer that is programmed in a different way and is sometimes correct” and these idiot corpos went “wow put it in everything”

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Excel is the fucking backbone of Microsoft Office. It’s solid and backwards compatible for a couple of decades. Excel is the one reason business sticks with Office. It never fails, everyone knows it, nothing can replace it. You cannot trust any other spreadsheet to perfectly translate if you move away from Excel. The world runs on Excel.

    I never imagined Microsoft would fuck with Excel. Ever. There’s a fairy tale about killing the golden goose, can’t remember how it goes.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      yep. it’s the one tool that is incredibly versatile in the workplace and for which I do not have a replacement

      are there better tools? quite often. would those tools be able to be used by anybody opening the files you are sharing with them? nope. and keeping things in the same format means it’s very easy to move data across files and link things up.

      forms, trackers, calculations, data logging, all easy to reference/transfer to one another and I can expect anybody on my team to be able to work with files I send them without having to teach them how to use a different program

    • FreedomAdvocate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How is adding new features that you don’t have to use but which can be insanely powerful “fucking with it”?

    • PKscope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Just look what they’re doing with their Xbox brand. One of the most well established brands in the most profitable entertainment sector and they are literally setting fire to it in every conceivable direction.

      Microsoft must be taking business cues from GRRM… Kill all your main characters.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Forget Xbox, look at how they’re treating Windows lately. Loaded with ads and bloat, forced hardware upgrades with Win11, forced MS account sign-in with no option for local accounts unless you’re running one of the Enterprise/IoT SKUs…

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          unless you’re running one of the Enterprise/IoT SKUs…

          That is the whole point. They’re squeezing the users they don’t give a shit about. But personal users almost never buy Windows licenses from Microsoft I’d bet. So what if they switch away? And how are they or their kids going to play Fortnite or League after switching?

          The money for Windows non-Enterprise is made with OEM deals. They probably wouldn’t even notice if nobody bought personal licenses anymore. Might as well make actual money from selling data about them.

          Enterprise is a different story, once you squeeze too hard, companies will find ways to replace you; they are somewhat resilient to pain, but it does have limits.

          • 4am@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Like 99% of laptops and desktops sold come with a Windows Home license. Those are OEM deals but they’re also screwing those customers

            • Laser@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Yeah, this wasn’t about whether they’re screwing the customers - they are - but about whether this has any negative financial implications for them

  • robador51@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Excel is such an incredible piece of shit. There’s many reasons to hate it for me, but what i hate the most is not being able to do relationships in any meaningful way. So often i need to have one to many relationships and this garbage makes it impossible. Data consistency? Nope. Opening a csv? Fuck you! Why the fuck are there online tools that are better at this shit? You had 40 years ffs. No amount of AI is going to fix this turd. God I hate Excel.

    • ReducedArc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      With power query, Excel can perform more database-like functions, I use it all the time! It comes with it’s own quirks however

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      There’s a ton of reasons to hate Excel, I’m sure, but I don’t think lack of support for relational data is a reasonable one. There’s tools for that job, but Excel isn’t trying to be one of them.

      • robador51@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I get that. But it’s a case that’s just so incredibly common. Tagging/categorization. We end up with multiple columns like ‘cat 1’, ‘cat 2’, etc. Or doing pivot tables. I guess to me there’s pretty much always something that can do the job better, but the reality is that in the corporate setting I operate in everybody uses Excel.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You are trying to use Excel like a database and that’s not its job. Use Access for that, if you must stick within the Office ecosystem

          • robador51@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            If I’m the only one doing it then I’d prefer to stick with sqlite. But the reality is that everyone I work with does these kinds of things in excel, and it’s a shitshow. Yes, u could say ‘don’t blame the tool’, but it’s ms shoving it down our throats and they could’ve done much better with the time they had.

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Just because it doesn’t offer features a database has doesn’t mean people aren’t trying to use it as one

        I support your argument, but unfortunately there are some real monstrosities out there that have carried small businesses since decades

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, not denying that people use Excel to do all kinds of crazy shit. People using the tool wrong isn’t the tool’s fault though, right?

          • Doomsider@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Wrong! If I am using a hammer to deliver babies I expect hammer manufacturers to put a rubber coating on the claw so it doesn’t scratch the baby as I pry it out.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s about time all those math types learned to relax a bit. These numbers in these spreadsheets don’t need to be exact all the time. It’s really more about the overall flavor of the spreadsheet than how “right” any individual field is. Error bars are there for a reason people!

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trillions of dollars to develop a calculator that’s wrong sometimes.

    • FreedomAdvocate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      AI Agents having access to the functionality of Excel means that they won’t be wrong with the actual calculations though, since it doesn’t do 5x10 in the LLM but instead uses excels built in functions to do it.

      AI and excel are a match made in heaven tbh. Same with AI and databases.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        No, the user is wrong quite often, the calculator gives the answer to the question asked, not the answer to the question the user wanted to ask.

        Garbage in, garbage out.

        • setsubyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          That’s funny because I grew up with math teachers constantly telling us that we shouldn’t trust them.

          Normal calculators that don’t have arbitrary precision have all the same problems you get when you use floating point types in a programming language. E.g. 0.1+0.2==0.3 evaluates to false in many languages. Or how adding very small numbers to very large numbers might result in the larger number as is.

          If you’ve only used CAS calculators or similar you might not have seen these too since those often do arbitrary precision arithmetics, but the vast majority of calculators is not like that. They might have more precision than a 32 bit float though.

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Only when people use the wrong input, garbage in and garbage out.

          In the same vein I can’t think of any instance where excel had calculated things wrong unless there was a fault in the formula that I made.

          • bus_factor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Except if you’re calculating dates from a long time ago. It famously takes some liberties with leap years.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Everyone else who’s anti-AI:

    • What is that smell? It smells like a used diaper filled with Indian food!
    • What is that?! It smells like a turd covered in burnt hair!
    • It smells like Bigfoot’s dick!
    • What is that stench?! It smells like the inside of a fake leg!
  • youngalfred@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Did he just spend the first half of the article explaining why ‘copilot in excel’ (not agent mode) wasn’t designed for calculation tasks, them finishes with complaining that on benchmarks it fails 80% of the time?

    The 54% accuracy of agent mode should be called out, not the low accuracy of the thing that wasn’t designed for it.