• phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So this means EU’s aud to Ukraine is unblocked, unless the lowlife fascists in Czechia or Slovakia decide to take Hungary’s place in being obstructive.

  • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    People tend to underestimate the enormous success of the EU. It can be seen in the economical developments of Poland and the Baltic states. Ukraine saw it and wanted in on it. Russia knowing that if Ukraine too would ‘fall’ to democracy, Russia itself would inevitably follow. So Navalny needed to be killed, Ukraine invaded, the EU sabotaged. Hungary was their pawn. Not only could Hungary halt EU decision making through veto’s, they could also be used in propaganda. How can Putin be all bad if even this EU country sympathizes with him? The EU will now be very inclined to make Hungary as succesfull as they can. It’s too early to celebrate, the Hungarian government will still be filled with lots of Fidesz bureaucrats. And the new government may still be inclined to use its ties with Russia. But the past decades have proven that the cheap Russian oil can’t compensate for the corruption that comes along. Magyars anti-corruption stance is pretty much saying: we want to model our country towards the EU examples, not Russia. Lets hope Magyar succeeds and other countries follow. Lets hope that eventually Belarus and Russia will rejoin the European family. The world has much to win here. The US not understanding why they need to support Ukraine tells us they don’t care much for democracy anymore. It’s understandable that if your government fails to supply you with decent living conditions, you won’t be inclined to support helping out other countries on the path towards decent government. But both can be done at the same time: focus on sorting out your own government, while simultaneously supporting other countries on the same path. The EU has been the driving force behind multilateralism. If we want a rules-based order, if we want to save the planet, if we want a better future, we want a strong EU leading the way. We want to support nations in their striving for democracy.

    • Lehmuusa@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Lets hope that eventually Belarus and Russia will rejoin the European family.

      That will take time.
      The Russia is now politically about where Ukraine was around year 1970. And it took Ukraine until 2008 to start seriously becoming democratic, and even then it seemed to keep regressing again and again. Only the aggression by the Russia in 2014 stabilized Ukraine’s path towards democracy. This took Ukraine altogether about 40 years and the Russia won’t be able to be faster than that. The couple decades of extremely immense propaganda have taken their toll. If the propaganda somehow ends this year or the next, then the children born now will still be imbued by it because of their parents’ thinking, and the children of the children being born now are going to be reasonably okay, already. But still not really ready for EU. But the grandchildren of children being born in 2026 might really be able to feel European. So, when those are adults, then maybe. If the Russia ends the propaganda now.

      But the Russian propaganda is something that has existed for several centuries and from conversations I’ve had with Russians in Russian language, I don’t really get a feeling that they will be letting go of that anytime soon. A Russia without Pushkin… What would that even be? Such a huge part of their literature is so toxic that whatever they try to achieve, their old literature will pull them back into what they have been for centuries.

      We can always live in hope, but I really don’t think the Russia can become anything humanely thinking anytime in the next two centuries at least.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Also if Russia joins the EU, the EU would be 2/3 Russia in terms of land mass and a quarter of the EU population would be a Russian citizen. Not sure if that is a good idea. Would give this one country way too much leverage and power inside the EU, especially once the Russian GDP per capita matches Germany or Netherlands. Like we already see how much power Germany has in the EU.

        Russia should defederate and fall apart first like every federal district or republic should become their own country before they join the EU.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        A collapse of Lukashenko’s gangster dictatorship would be a welcome development. He’s propped up by Putin, but there’s not much Putin will be able to do to save his bacon if the Belarussian people decide it’s now safe to stand up to him.

        What’s recently transpired in Moldova followed the same pattern, and Russia lost that puppet. And now they’ve lost their Hungarian fifth columnist too. Now, if the oil price drops back, Putin will be even worse off.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What a great day for Democracy, now hopefully he follows through on his promise of constitutional reform and dismantling the Orban mafia so this can’t happen again.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    First things, first: Congratulations to all Hungarians!

    As for the rest of Europe, does this mean the other Russian agent, Fico, won’t have anybody covering his back in the EU anymore?

    • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Who would had thought it wouldn’t help Orbans case to have JD couchfucker Vance and the Hitler gang beside you. Laughing stuck. It’s almost like Orban had proud in making Hungary a puppet state for russia and china. (USA is a puppet of russia that’s why they aren’t mentioned)

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I’ve lived in a couple of countries in Europe and in my experience the American style of Far Right doesn’t really go down well around here, not even in Britain (though that seems to be changing with all the transphobia popping up over there nowadays).

        Certainly American Nationalism isn’t welcome and the (pseudo-)religious crap doesn’t land well here either nowadays (it’s funny how in the XXI century the US is the closest to a Theocracy of all Western nations whilst in the rest religiouness has been seriously dampened by Universal Education).

        Only the anti-immigration talk goes does well with supporters of the local Far-Right around here.

        Further, I suspect that the side-effects of America’s and Israel’s attack on Iran are switching people of from Islamophobia - except perhaps in the UK the local Press just isn’t anywhere as unified in using Manufacturing Consent techniques to spin America and Israel as the good guys fighting the evil “Regime” in Iran, so people seem to be blaming America and Israel for all this shit rather than Iran.

        Last but no least, there’s not really any MAGA over here, so from hearing and seeing him talk on TV people have an almost universal opinion of Trump as a disgusting liar because he’s constantly and very obviously contradicting himself and his body language just shouts sleazy asshole and for people without the mindset of constantly coming up with excuses for him of the True Believer, Trump just looks like a slimy shity loudmoth.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          in my experience the American style of Far Right doesn’t really go down well around here, not even in Britain

          Well, Orban was in power for 16 years. Fico and Babiš are still in power, as is Meloni, though so far she’s been staying within the EU and her power seems to be waning after her referendum to capture the judiciary was rejected by voters. So anti-immigrant hard-right thuggery still wins elections in some EU countries, though they seem to be on the wane.

          And as for Britain: in England, it looks like Reform (the fascist party led by Farage, who constantly parrots MAGA talking points) will take over leadership of quite a few councils in next month’s local elections, despite their record of corruption, failure and incompetence in the few councils they currently control. Their polling isn’t as high as initially predicted, but Labour’s support has collapsed and the Conservatives are dead in the water too. The Greens are also polling well, but they’ve had to scale up rapidly and haven’t yet demonstrated national reach, though in the region of England where I live, they have a fairly good chance of replacing Labour as the majority party in our county and city councils. As for the LibDems, they remain small but will probably maintain their vote share due to good local organisation.

          In Scotland, it’s still the SNP. In Wales, Plaid Cymru looks like it’ll take over.

          The big unknown in England is whether Labour can stop the rot, break the control of the Labour Together faction and replace Starmer with a soft-left PM. I’m not at all optimistic. Even if they ditch him, the parliamentary party is brain-dead enough to choose Streeting as their next leader. He’s as authoritarian and corporation-friendly as Starmer, and even more slimy.

          • BlushedPotatoPlayers@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 minutes ago

            That’s true, but in every important EU-level vote, Hungary was the inflamed pimple on EUs ass, I truly hope this will change now.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            50 minutes ago

            My point is that there isn’t a Far Right in Europe or that it’s small, it’s that most of the Far Right dog-whistles from America don’t work in Europe.

            Present day Europeans rarelly care about all the “God talk”, they don’t overly care about Homosexuality or Transsexuality and the certainly don’t think America is a Great Nation.

            Absolutelly, the anti-immigration discourse goes down really well here (in fact, it’s the core of the Far-Right ideology in Europe), but beyond that what exactly is the part of the American Far-Right discourse which would make Europeans be more interested in that side of politics beyond what the Far-Right discourse of the local politicians already does.

            IMHO, the biggest impact of America on the Far-Right in Europe is the money they give to the Far Right in Europe rather than an ideological foundation.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m happy for your people and for Europe. I hope this movement keeps its promises.

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I hope this movement keeps its promises.

        This sentence is a damning indictment of a political climate where keeping one’s promises is a hope, not a given. To worry about betrayal should be a fringe concern, not a reasonable scepticism.

        And yet, here we are. It’s hard not to become a cynic.

  • JustTheWind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    227
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Viktor fucking POS Orban steps down with more dignity after 16 years than our own home grown dictator wannabe did after 4. What a timeline to be alive in.

  • fun_times@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    On the one hand, his ideology is more or less identical to Orban’s (he used to be a Fidesz party member until two tears ago).

    On the other hand, he is somewhat EU friendly, supports Ukraine and, most importantly, is the head of a different party. 16 years of Fidesz rule is over. That’s not nothing.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      his ideology is more or less identical to Orban’s

      Fidesz (Orban):

      • Ideology: Christian Nationalism, Illiberalism, Authoritarianism, National Conservatism, Right-wing Populism
      • Political position: Far-right

      Tisza (Magyar):

      • Ideology: Conservative Liberalism, Populism, Pro-Europeanism
      • Political position: Centre to centre-right

      I’ve heard this angle before, but these parties don’t seem to be in any way identical.

      • fun_times@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        “Conservative liberalism” is an oxymoron. Centre to centre-right means social liberalism and an acceptance/approval of the welfare state.

        Conservatism of any kind is right to far-right.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            In most of Europe, “liberal” means being in favor of free trade, and of unregulated capitalism in general. Conservative parties in many countries are called Liberals. Even in the UK Conservatives, there’s a strong liberal (by the above definition) faction, along with the racists, authoritarians and religious reactionaries (the last of which are a much smaller minority here than in the US).

          • fun_times@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            What is even funnier to me is that it lists the Swedish party Liberalerna as a “Conservative Liberal” party. That party has voted 100% (not 99% or 98%, exactly identical) to Moderaterna, a conservative party, during this latest four-year period. Nobody is going to vote for them in the upcoming election because they are a fundamentally unnecessary party that just does whatever Moderaterna tells them to do.

        • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Conservatism of any kind is right to far-right.

          What a bizarre statement. If I want to conserve social democracy, workers rights, unions, public infrastructure, etc. where as my political opponents want to ‘liberalise’ or downgrade them, that makes me a left-wing conservatist.

          • fun_times@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Conservatism is an ideology based on the idea of family-first policies, nationalism and religious values. You might as well claim that anarchism is anything that creates chaos or that liberalism is anything that makes you free. You have misunderstood what the word means in a political context.

              • fun_times@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 minutes ago

                I’m Swedish.

                Not a single social democrat in my country would ever call themselves conservative, even though they want to preserve the welfare state that the right is eroding. Only the right and the far right call themselves conservatives.

            • Lehmuusa@nord.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Conservatism means wanting to keep the society as it is. It is the antonym of being progressive. And that’s it.

              A party that wants things to to just remain stable as they are is a conservative party. A party that wants to make dramatic changes is a progressive, or maybe also regressive, party. But absolutely not conservative.

              Yes, in USA some people have started using the word “conservative” in a different meaning. That doesn’t alter what the word really means. Those who want to conserve what exists.

              (And in USA the Democratic party has taken the conservative role, whereas the Republican party has taken an anti-conservative role, driving radical changes to things. Changes to a direction I see as very damaging for everyone, but changes all the same. Wanting such huge changes makes you an anti-conservative.)

              • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 hour ago

                Conservatism means wanting to keep the society as it is.

                Conservatism has never been that. It has always been about defending the privilege of the unaccountable elite, against meritocracy and rule of law. Throughout history, conservatives supported vast social changes, as long as they were at the expense of working people. Consider the enclosure of the commons in Britain as one big example, that led to destitution, famine and mass emigration.

                So it’s important to keep in mind what’s being conserved: it’s not the status quo, it’s the rich’s ability to do what they want without being held accountable. The actual policies promoted by conservatives have been widely changeable over time, but that key principle remains the same.

            • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Within politics these words are still context dependent and used to describe all sorts of stances and are open to various interpretations. It’s an umbrella term. To claim otherwise is simply besides the facts. I know lots of leftwingers who call themselves conservative. About liberalism and anarchism, yes you might use those terms in those ways, and that is actually being done all the time.

              • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I know lots of leftwingers who call themselves conservative.

                Then you know lots of people who have no idea what they’re talking about.

    • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Bernie Sanders is also a Democrat. Big parties, by definition, have people from all over the political spectrum inside.

      I don’t know enough about him, but from what I read he is very different from Orban and his victory will be a case study for politicians all over the world that want to defeat Trumplike right wing politicians.

      • fun_times@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Big parties in FPTP and other non-proportional systems have people from all over the political spectrum.

        Big parties in MMP and other proportional systems have ideologies and stick to their ideologies.

        Bernie Sanders would never be in the same party as Joe Biden in a proportionally representative democracy.

        • luciferofastora@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          FPTP is the poison that turns a good idea into a farce. On the surface, it’s far simpler to explain and thus a better way to “ease” people unfamiliar with democracy into the concept without having to explain the more democratic, but also more complex options.

          It should be an initial stage at best, from which a more democratic solution would be developed, but by the time the need for that becomes obvious, the emerging “main” parties have a vested interest in maintaining power.

          I don’t have a perfect solution. Humans are complex and flawed and education can be difficult if the motivation isn’t obvious. But I think pushing for more representative systems should be a priority for any movement trying to redeem democratic systems.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            FPTP is crap, but all electoral systems can be gamed and can produce anomalous and antidemocratic results in various edge cases.

        • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Big parties in MMP and other proportional systems have ideologies and stick to their ideologies.

          Not really because big parties get more seats. In a voting circle with less people there will only be 1 or 2 seats available for that circle, so, they will go either 2 for the gov party or 1 for the gov and 1 for the main opposition party.

          Smaller parties will only elect seats in the capital or big cities, which means if you want to have a political career you choose the party that more or less aligns with you from the big ones.

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He was known in the party as someone who disagreed on many decisions made by Orbán. He also stated it was not easy to leave and/or cut ties due to mafia-like behavior, fear of his or his family’s life. His wife was head of Ministry of Justice, which she was kicked out due to also going against Orbán’s wishes.

      You have to understand that Orbán is literally an oligarch with tons of money, ties to Russia and the underworld. Magyar only quite recently collected enough support (about 2 years ago I think) to start his own political movement.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I’d say it helps that Hungary being in the EU probably limited Orban going full dictator. The EU had been chastising Hungary. Withholding EU funds hurts Hungary quite a bit. This is a reason why the far right hates the EU and looking to dismantle it, with the help of their American friends.

      • elBedrock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        10 hours ago

        He was known in the party as someone who disagreed on many decisions made by Orbán.

        Can you provide a source for this please? I am a Hungarian and never heard of this.

        His wife was head of Ministry of Justice, which she was kicked out due to also going against Orbán’s wishes.

        She was kicked out because she gave an official pardon to a well known pedophile. They divorced after that.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Oh fucking please. Fidesz got hammered by corruption scandals in 2024, Magyar dramatically breaks from the party over corruption, and somehow builds a massive nationwide coalition in a matter of months? The Hungarian opposition somehow abandons all its beliefs and rallies around a politician who holds all Orban’s political views?

      The term for this is “planned opposition”.

      Magyar isn’t Orban’s rival. He’s Orban’s chosen successor.

      It’s easy to win an election if you own all the candidates.

      And y’all fell for it.

      • antisoumerde@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 minutes ago

        All that matter to me as a .world genocide supporter is that now we can send our youth to die in ukraine to own the tankies.

        Coz I’m very afraid of Putin while sitting in my comfy chair in Toronto .

        Also yes i smell like rotten semen. I have a secret stash of dick cheese under my foreskin

      • If he was supposed to be Orban’s successor, they wouldn’t have had him start a new party or run a heavily pro-EU campaign. That makes no sense. You’d just have Orban step down and have the new guy take over in the next election cycle. Keeps momentum for the main party and all the installed cronies, no expectation of change from the population, no need to stir the hive. If Magyar backtracks on his promises now, you’ll end up with a lot of unrest among the people, exactly what you want to avoid when planning your succession.

        Magyar’s been communicating very effectively with the people for years. Opposition rallying behind the best chance at unseating an autocrat who threatens to establish indefinite single-party rule only makes sense.

        • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          46 seconds ago

          That’s why it’s called planned opposition. If you’re afraid of losing control to a genuine opposition movement, you set up a fake opposition movement that dramatically opposes you on a few big ticket items and generally agrees with you on the rest.

          Look, I’d like to be wrong. I hope I’m wrong. But I expect Magyar is going to make some dramatic promises about the economy and human rights, back down on his pro-EU stances, and quietly take his orders from Orban and Putin behind the scenes.

      • Brummbaer@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Conspiracy smugness - I love it. I wonder what the technical term for that is.

        Tisza already announced a pro-Europe course and who has to gain most of that - Ukraine, but since Orban can’t cut ties with Russia without falling out a window it was indeed a planned a opposition conspiracy by Orban that got taken over by Ukrainian intelligence which in turn is lead by the French DGSE, to get eastern Europe out of the Russian sphere.

        So basically you fell for one of the oldest tricks the French intelligence services deploy since Napoleon. If you take over the man behind the man (in this case Selensky) you can’t lose and no one can trace it back to you.

        NB: Ex falso, quod libet.

        • antisoumerde@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 minutes ago

          Tisza already announced a pro-Europe course and who has to gain most of that

          The weapon industry

      • fun_times@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Me: am cautiously and very slightly optimistic while being aware of the fact that Magyar has a lot of similarities to Orban, and that Orban accepts the outcome of the election.

        You: You’ve been duped! He’s Orban’s chosen siccessor and you are fully unaware of this!

        Like, come on, man. Have some amount of hope in the betterment of the world. I’m not saying that progress under Magyar is a guarantee. I’m saying there is a possibility.

        • antisoumerde@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Yes now we’ll finally be able to give all our money to the people that bribed von der leyen. Maybe even do a draft so we can send our youth to die there. How glorious will it be?

        • TheFrogThatFlies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I really want to tell you how wrong you are, if I didn’t think the same… Let’s hope we are both wrong!

  • Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Imagine being such a world class fuck up that you fucking torpedo a 16 year long dictatorship by stumping for it for a week… that’s so incompetent it’s almost impressive.

    • marx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Still a lot of work to do. His cronies still hold a ton of power and control much of the media.

      Magyar winning will get the headlines but Tisza getting a supermajority in parliament (which they seem on track to do but I don’t think is official yet) will be the much more important win. That’s where durable reform can be made.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Are there good signs these guys would make such reforms instead of holding onto the power given by changes made by Orban?

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          14 hours ago

          They campaigned on wealth taxes, term limits for every member of parliament, an independent prosecutor’s office, joining the EPPO and so on.

          They have unlimited power right now, but are dependent on an extremely heterogenous voter base that would implode if they look the wrong way.

          Nothing is certain, but it could not look much better right now.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I’m hoping that belarussians get the courage they need from this and finally revolt against their shit of a ruler.

    • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Iceland next. Bog britain still a long shot. Ukraine most likely before BB. EU needs Ukraine. They militiary is probably the most capable in the world against the Russian army, and defense in general. This is why there is no way around accepting Ukraine into EU.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Sure seems like a roundabout way of just… being in the EU.

        Are you British, by chance? What’s the mood on Brexit these days?

        • cynar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The Brexit crowd have gone conspicuously silent about it. Their lack of crowing says a lot about it.

          Even before Brexit, the tide had turned, and that’s only gotten stronger. Unfortunately, the government had their vote and hammered it through. (The fact there was an EU rule change, on tax transparency, the next day, and would have embarrassed a lot of rich UK toffs had NOTHING to do with the timing)

          Unfortunately, the reform party is far too strong, and trying to drag us to the extreme right. Our “left wing” primary party (Labour) is now further right than the conservatives (center right party) traditionally sit.

          It’s… frustrating.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            That sounds… British. Frustrating, in a frustratingly orderly way.

            Outside far-right politics must be making reform look bad in the UK though. Right? Like Hungary, Turkey, whatever’s going in Germany…

            • cynar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              We are in a media bubble. Basically all our media is owned by a few rich arseholes and they bury a lot of anti right messages.

              The BBC used to be remarkably honest and independent from government. The conservatives getting their claws into it was the beginning of the real problems. Even worse, the BBC’s impartiality has been so sacrosanct that a lot of older people just believe it.

              A mild bit of light. The green party seems to also be making significant advances. Labour have often played the “don’t split the left vote” card on them. Now it looks like green is overtaking them in some areas. It just doesn’t show up well in a FPTP voting system.

              • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                13 hours ago

                Ah, moguls + FPTP strike again.

                Yeah, I can see Green gaining traction as climate/environmental problems start to grow. The British Isles are relatively sensitive. Though it seems Green has had its own controversy (kinda like the small parties here in the US have).

                • cynar@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  The UK is still a lot more multi party at the lower levels of government, compared to the US. Unfortunately it’s erring towards the US system, rather than away from it.

  • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Great, lets see what changes now. It would be good to have Hungary “back” in the European Union. But it is too soon to tell.