• betanumerus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    It’s amazing that they actually designed the beds to fail in the worst possible way. I mean this is cartoon crazy.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ha, this reminds me of the death of the guy that gave the world lead poisoning.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        His best invention was the bed that killed him! If only those who designed the “smart” beds that need functioning network access (and working AWS) had all been in one.

  • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So instead of it defaulting to last known good settings, it couldn’t poll AWS to retrieve the user settings and either just went into debug alert mode or the hardcoded defaults are full upright and max temp. More premium products kneecapped by poor management in a race to enshittify everything

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    A reminder to not buy “smart” home appliances unless you can self-host it’s internet connectivity or its “smart” features are optional.

  • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I feel like if I was gonna put a computer attached to a motor & heater inside a bed, the very first step would be making sure that if the software goes wrong, it always defaults to staying bed shaped and not catching fire.

    I know I know hindsight is 20/20, I’m sure I’m just missing something. Venture capitalists would just give their money to any random idiot with a pitch, right?

    • tuff_wizard@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      17 hours ago

      why? what if they want more money and decide to make it go subscription based? do you and the shareholders want to risk people just…unplugging them and continuing to use them? the mere idea made me drop my monocle .

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Because their favourite YouTuber tells them how much better they’re feeling after getting one.

            It’s why sponsorships are an outright negative for me when looking at products. They abuse the authority influencers seem to get. “Oh I like him and his videos, he wouldn’t lie to me.” Yeah right.

            • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Absolutely, some youtubers are nothing but paid shills.

              On the other hand, there are some who have a lot of integrity. If TechMoan for example tells us that something actually works, I’ll be very inclined to believe him.

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Right, and we should protect them by passing laws penalizing companies from such shitty software. Cuz the average person can’t access the source code.

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Reminds me that nurse interview in Spain during the blackout:

    “But your hospital doesn’t have a backup generator?? -Oh we have solar panels, we could be running off the grid! But the power management system requires an Internet connection, and it’s down!”

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The nurse knew that the power management system required an Internet connection? That’s one geeky nurse.

      Still, I have hope with things like solar panels. I think these are likely to be teething pains there. Being off-grid on a solar panel is probably a pretty common situation, so they’re probably going to eventually work out the kinks. As long as there isn’t a monopoly on power management systems, or regulatory capture by the companies that make them, probably the ability to work disconnected from both the power and Internet grids will eventually happen. But, with Internet-of-Things stuff, there’s often a commercial incentive to mine people’s data and lock them into a subscription service model. So, that’s really going to require regulation to fix.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    234
    ·
    1 day ago

    You know this bed is great and all, but what it’s really missing is a mandatory connection to the Internet!

    …jfc

    • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Carla! Carla! What the fuck is this? I know you sleep on a 25. A 25 or a 30 if you fuck up swiping. I know for a fucking fact that you would NEVER choose to sleep on a 60, and yet I found a goddamn record of a 60 when I was out last week. Who was it? Who was here?”

      I really can’t see any other reason. A dial isn’t sexy but it’s far easier in every way

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Look you wanted a smart bed. We either incorporate that locally and jack the price and size 50%, or we offload the processing to a server farm and require internet

  • JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I thought I was terminally online but this is the moment I am hearing about smart beds. I guess the appeal is that it beams ads directly into your dreams?

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Not that it isn’t wildly ridiculous and stupid to have an internet connected bed, but couldn’t you just unplug it if it’s overheating?

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    172
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    People in the 80’s: “In the year 2025 we’re going to have hoverboards and flying cars!”

    2025: “I can’t use my bed because the servers are down”

    Stop making the future stupid. Never buy anything that needs to be connected to a server to work for no good reason.

    • undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Smart products themselves are not the issue. The issue is making everything cloud based. The solution is companies designing their products so they can be controlled over the network.

      It’s a fucking bed! It doesn’t need a persistent connection to some server. The problem is that they also want to mine and sell your data.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Smart products are part of the issue, and smart products that fail in dumb ways are a really big part of the issue.

        Any smart product, pretty much by definition, has to have a computer in it. Anything with a computer in it can be hacked. There’s really no good reason that your bed should have an attack surface.

        If you are going to have smarts in something, it really needs to fail well. Like, for a bed, it should have something that bypasses the smarts and lets it go back to “dumb bed” mode no matter what. No matter what position it’s in, it should be possible to make it go flat even if you have no Internet connection. In fact, even if the smart parts are not working at all, there should be a way to make it go flat, even if that’s a purely mechanical system that allows you to bypass the motors.

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also people in the 80’s: “I love my waterbed, but my back is killing me for some reason.”