Hey all, just wondering if anyone has any good self-hosted security cam recs? Have plenty of space and server options, and next big thing on my list is to get rid of my battery cloud cams. They have worked well enough I guess for a few years, but really pretty slow and limited, wondering if anyone has experience with any self-hosted solutions, preferably with similar features ie: motion detection, app/webapp, maybe battery op?

  • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Slightly off topic and something I read from somewhere else, but make sure whatever you use can write the date & time onto the camera images, otherwise it isn’t usable for any police / insurance claims.

    I’d guess all systems do this now, but just wanted it to be on your checklist of features.

    If the camera doesn’t do it, then the storage server must.

    (And make sure the clock is sync’d to something 😉)

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Reolink cameras are self-hosted. You don’t have to have an account in their app, and nothing is synced to the cloud. It’s all stored locally. They’re expensive cameras by comparison, but a. they’re really high quality, and b. they’re not subsidized by subscription fees.

    • UnrefinedChihuahua@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      I recently added two reolink cameras to my setup. Out of the box, they would not let me assign them IPs, they did not even try to get an IP from my network. They needed to be connected to via the mobile app the first time, then reconfigured for IP. Wasn’t a great user experience even if the cameras are now fine.

      Onboarding a networked device should not require a mobile app, fill stop.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Be careful with reolink, their P2P solution is pretty suspicious. No body really knows how it works and who it shares the data with.

      You can disable those features, but it will stop reolink app from working.

      They have never explained how the prer-2-peer network works, and it security and privacy is quite unknown.

      Reolink is Chinese, which doesn’t really help these concerns.

      Better to selfhost frigate and just rtsp cameras there.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I would assume it’s based on TURN or STUN, since you don’t need to log in. What makes it suspicious?

        Edit: I did some reading on their blog, and they only mention something like STUN and specifically say it’s only for connection, not for relaying, so I don’t think they use TURN. In that case, the camera is streaming video directly to your phone, so it sounds like it’s not ever passing through a ReoLink server. The benefit to ReoLink is they only have to run a STUN server, which is incredibly cheap (bandwidth wise), and the benefit to you is that the video never goes through anyone else’s server. The drawback is if you have a really restrictive firewall, or some funky address translation, you might not be able to establish a connection.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 hours ago

    For non cloud cams, someone posted here a while back about thingno firmware, takes cheap cams off the cloud. Works great on a wyze cam and was a gamechanger for me. Sttrroonngglllyyy recommend

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I see it supports many cameras, but you need to pull them apart and use a serial hookup to flash the firmware… but for the wyze cams and a few others you can flash them directly with an SD card.

        I liked how cheap the wyze cams were but desperately wanted to get them offline. This was my silver bullet.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Oh thank god. This solves my problem of no good integrated cam hardware on the market that isn’t cloudified or a huge security hole.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          How you gonna get the video feed off an IP cam and onto your NVR without connecting it to your network?

          You’re not seriously suggesting using old analog cameras in 2025, are you?

          • 123@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Maybe they mean main network? Lots of people seem to have a separate vlan with strict rules on what they can cobtact for IoT devices nowadays due to how poorly secured they are.

    • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      New to me & bookmarked. I am sure I have some crap lying around that this would work with.

      Thank you!

    • lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      My amcrest cameras have been good, but hikvision has been even better. They’re sneaky though so make sure they’re on an isolated vlan.

      • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Used them before, but you have to be kinda careful with Amcrest, every once in awhile they throw one out that is especially shitty to self host.

  • plateee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is maybe controversial, but I love the Ubiquiti security stuff. Cameras (interior and exterior) doorbells, etc, it’s all great. Pricey, but you get what you pay for.

    And the data can stay local or be accessible via their services.

    I chose to go local only, grabbed their UNVR and populated it with 4x 2TB drives and it has enough space to handle 7 cameras HD history for about a month.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’ve experimented with ubiquiti cameras and for the most part I find them very overpriced for their quality point. They’re good cameras, but they’re not ONVIF compatible so if you want to get into their (super overpriced and limited) ecosystem you won’t be able to intermix other cameras easily.

      A good example is their doorbell camera. It’s just not good. And they don’t have more than one model, so if you want a good one you’re buying something else, that won’t work in their software, so now you’re using two systems to watch your cameras.

      I’m glad they work for you, but I don’t recommend getting into their camera ecosystem.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        UniFi Protect now has limited ONVIF support allowing various 3rd party cameras to work with Protect.

        UniFi cameras can have RTSP enabled also, but it requires UniFi Protect to enable the setting.

  • Changer098@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I tried to use Shinobi as my PVR for a while but dealt with a lot of usability and stability issues. Switching to Frigate has been much better. Configuration can be a bit difficult but it’s rock solid and really great. Plus the home assistant integration is top notch. I’ve had a lot of luck with Amcrest cameras and also managed to use a cheap Tapo camera within my setup.

  • black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    When I needed this I reached for whatever generic rtmp cameras were well rated. Blocked them from external access (including outgoing!) at the firewall level and used Zoneminder and some custom scripts to monitor.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Can we pin one of these posts? The same thing gets asked even few days and the answers don’t change nearly that frequently

  • AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I have a Reolink PoE camera. It works fine. As far as I can tell, it only uses the internet to check for updates and set the time, but I have it blocked off anyway. Home Assistant was actually causing it to check for updates, too, so that got disabled.
    I don’t record, so I can’t help you there.
    I will say that is a pain to get Home Assistant to display real-time video instead of a slide show.

      • JaddedFauceet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Eh? Shouldn’t it be real time already?

        this is my configuration:

          - camera_view: live
            type: picture-glance
            entities: []
            camera_image: camera.cam_profile000_mainstream
            tap_action:
              action: none
        

        I am using ONVIF integration for the camera.

        Mine even play audio

  • non_burglar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Frigate is popular.

    I used to use ZoneMinder, it worked well, but you must be very familiar with onvif, primary/secondary channels, and key frames for it to work well.

    I only switched to frigate because of the person/animal detection. It’s ok, but it does need some polish in a few areas like event retention, and it could stand some more approachable documentation.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I just checked out frigate, and I see it crutches on docker. Anything docker-free?

    • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Zoneminder is an option.

      It’s been around since before containers were a thing, so fairly stable.

      Not used it myself, but when I get around to needing cameras (I’m in a small house in a low crime area), then thats what I’m planning to use.

      It has (had?) an integration in MythTv too, so I can see who’s a the door whilst watching TV at the same time.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Dahua and Hikvision have great cameras but of course you shouldn’t trust them. Block them at the firewall. I bought mine a few years ago and preferred Hikvision for its better built in webserver for initial configuration.

    On the hosting side you run Frigate, Zoneminder or BlueIris (Windows) to control the cameras and record their streams.

  • yaroto98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Any cam with an rtsp stream is fine. Host frigate on your server point it to the cams you can get audio and video and object detection pretty easily. I also recommend taking an extra step and creating a firewall rule to block the cams’ inbound/outbound internet traffic.

  • SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    For hardware, anything that can provide a local rtsp stream is a good place to start. I run cheap and cheerful mix of tapo, unbranded and homebrew esp32 cams. Offload the motion/object detection and alerts to something that can pull in the feeds, and isolate the cams to local network only.

    WiFi usually ok, but at least hardwire the power to save future grief.

    Using frigate to manage mine, which is running under Homeassistant - another project worth looking up.

    A few images, featuring Freddie the visitor: