UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

  • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The US has the largest military navy in the world, by far. They can very well choose to “escort ships” on their own, if they’re ready to accept the risks that comes with it.

    The US is essentially looking for a sucker to stick his neck out for them. The British would be smart to keep out of this one, but again, they’re British.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 hours ago

      American here.

      Our asshole government started this fucking war and is fully responsible for the consequences. Other countries should embargo us until we agree to pay reparations to cover the economic damage caused by the war. Or better yet - seize any assets of American oligarchs to cover damages.

      It sounds like I’m ignoring the human cost of the war, and that’s because the human cost isn’t a concern for those behind Trump. The billionaire class running this country doesn’t care about how many innocent people suffer, so they need to be attacked economically.

      • faux@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I like the idea of them seizing the assets of the oligarchs, but I’m sure they’d come up with a way to make the 99% pay for it like they did after 08 and like they already are with the private credit collapse.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Were we not in a trade war with everyone all year? Why would they help us? Should have got the details worked out before starting shit if you were going to need help you stupid orange fuck.

    • Man_kind@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Technically the straight is vital for all countries. So Trump went and fucked the world with his war mongering. And countries may be wishing to workout a deal that if they help him, they get something if he is successful, but imo, that would be a mistake, since his agreements aren’t worth shit.

      So, to me, the only solution is to wait and see and leave trump on his own.

      He will definitely use that later on and accuse of not helping etc… but thats fine. If countries do help, it wont score them with brownie points, because trump always wants more, so if he can back out of a deal, and you dont have much leverage to force him not to, he will just TACO right out of it.

      I’d sooner help Iran secure the straight, and china, and bring the entire american economy to its knees, before I helped it win its war.

      And if I ever DID consider sending ships, I’d ask for 20 billion$ up front, and once the check clears, i will send my ships.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, agreed, this sucks for everyone but if they help it will only enable him further and he’ll have forgotten about it when he starts up on whatever the next distraction is. They’d be better off making a deal with Iran.

        • Man_kind@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ya, unfortunately Iran, Russia, China, these countries all suck as well. But Israel/US are a much more immediate threat. Unless you’re Ukraine, as russia is obviously the more immediate threat, and you dont want to help Iran for that reason, since they are team russia, but I agree Trump should not be enabled. Let him waste his resources and Iran’s and russia in a fight together, and we will pay the cost of inflation for it. It’s not a bad deal.

  • Mark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Calling us is lovely, but what exactly would you like us to do?

    We warned you that they would close the strait and that the world would be powerless. Now you went and did it anyway.

    So… Exactly WHAT would you like us to do?

    There are mines in that narrow gap now. We need to clear them while Iran is taking potshots at us. Clearing mines takes weeks. Even when NOT being shot at.

    No Trump. You break it, you own it.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Iran has already offered all countries the out of kicking out the US and Israel embassadors so that their ships are allowed to pass the Straight.

    Further, my impression is that at least in Europe and especially after the Greenland affair, most of the public opinion thinks Trump is an untrustworthy liar AND because they attacked Iran unprovoked, America and Israel are the ones to blame for the increase in fuel and gas prices they’re already feeling.

    (There’s enough independent press in most of Europe that the “blame Iran” messaging is far from dominant)

    The idea of sending European ships into Trump’s war is incredibly unpopular and whilst I don’t think we’re quite yet at the stage were kicking out the American embassador would be popular, the more fuel and gas prices go up the more acceptable it looks.

    Then the whole Epstein files thing throws suspicion in people’s minds on any European politician that’s a little too eager to do what America or Israel wants.

    At the very least the offer from Iran introduces doubt and confusion making it far harder for blackmailed European politicians to find a way to justify the incredibly unpopular idea of putting European ships and military at risk because of a war of pure aggression started by America and Israel.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Is that offer still open to friendly nations? As I understand it, they have been mining the strait, and things just seem a bit chaotic to mine it in a way that leaves a safe and known path, plus how to communicate that path to those they want to let through while denying those they don’t. Unless the minea are remote instead of proximity, but I think part of the point was to make the embargo passive so that carpet bombing the area wouldn’t be an effective counter.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t know about you but my youtube feed is now filled with NATO propaganda…

      • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Consume American media and media hosted by American companies, get fed pure propaganda.

        The old Soviet joke of “There is no pravda (truth) in Pravda, there’s no isvestia (news) in the Isvestia” also applies to the American (and British, Australian and possibly Canadian) Press and other modern means of “opinion forming”.

        Most countries in Europe aren’t quite as bad, but even here at least some of the Press is very biased and even Propagandistic (Germany what from what I’ve heard is especially bad, Britain I know from personal experience is horrible in that sense, possibly worse than the US)

  • stumu415@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Maybe FIFA can step in with the ‘straight out of Hormuz’ award. Also does anyone seriously think that China will assist the US after the way they have been and still are being treated?

  • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m pretty sure Trump and Netanyahu expects to have regime change in Iran just like that and now they are wondering why it wasn’t going well. It seems like Iran’s strong resistance came to the surprise to them. This is totally the most stupid of all wars, not a single plan what to do or how to do it.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They might have thought they could hold the world economy hostage to force other counties to act. Or the whole wanting things to get better is an act and the economic disruption is the whole point.

    • TrollTrollrolllol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m not sure the American people have learned their lesson yet. I say let the Tariffs continue until they realize they should never elect another Republican again. I say that as an American paying for the tariffs. The answer should just be “No.”

  • merdaverse@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So far, the US has not sent its own navy ships to escort tankers through the strait.

    Then why would other countries send ships to help in a war that the United States of Israel started without consulting them??? Trump, again, shitting himself and expecting others to clean him.