• filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 minutes ago

      They’re cheap because they use extensive tracking to make up the rest of their money

      Compare any tv to a monitor of the same size and feature set

  • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The tv should have always cost more. That’s part of the problem. America drunk on cheap consumer goods.

  • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    TV is cheap because you are the product. CEOs want you to see their ads, their propaganda.

    Gas is expensive because they have not yet found a way to stop car-owner from leaving the sofa in front of TV

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Visit Japan or the EU and their fuels prices make the USA cheap. It is odd in the USA, most people are concerned about fuel prices, but healthcare costs are far worse.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        A large portion of US adults don’t understand the difference between simple and compound interest.

        Many are living with less than 1 month salary as savings.

        This results in a largr portion with neither the mental space nor capability (or both) to worry about 6 months down the line when they have to worry for 6 days down the line

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Because you pay for gas every couple days with your credit card, while you pay for healthcare rarely

  • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Gas is a cheat code to decades of stored solar energy. It won’t be cheap for ever. Once you mine up all that shit it’s gone.

    Look at WV and their coal. Use to have 12 ft coal seams. Now all that’s left are hard to reach low quality 1-2ft seams. At some point it’s not even worth the energy to extract.

    • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      There are people who believe the earth regenerates and creates more petroleum… In essence it will never run out

      There’s probably a step g correlation to flat earthers

      • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It will! Just not within human life spans that’s my answer usually. Alot of their thoughts are grounded in something real. Its easier then telling them they are flat out wrong usually.

        Unless it’s the flat earthers

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I ride an ebike. Can someone explain the picture on the left? Is it some sort of tax booth for car ownership?

    • Karmanopoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Your bike has zero impact on the environment. Good for you

      The metals used in the frame and battery magically floated down from heaven. Also the tires and plastic parts weren’t used from petroleum …not at all

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Not zero, but dwarfed by a car. An E-bike is hands down way more eco-friendly option

      • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There was a recent article detailing how if you put a lot of miles on your ebike you’ll need to replace the battery and it’s surprisingly expensive.

        But I agree with the other downvoters that you can’t just say “but bad thing” you have to put them into perspective. And your parent comment didn’t claim ebikes are perfect or even good. Just that they literally don’t use gas.

        • Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Actually, Bloomberg Finance recently warned about how the cattle replacement level is precariously low in the US. It takes a minimum of a one-year forecast to gauge how many dairy cows will be born to reach milk production status, and apparently farmers are having a difficult time with all the debt and limited resources hampering them. Because of the US’s red meat addiction, we are currently at best only at minimum replacement, which is really concerning until the nation reduces some of its cattle consumption; otherwise, beef prices will continue to rise…

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The fuck? Milk is 2x to 4x cheaper ($0.50-$1.00) than the most common gasoline, Natural 95 ($2.10) here. I thought you’d get something from those crazy “Got milk?” dairy subsidies…

      (Multiply by 4.5 to get US units rather than liters)

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          It’s fewer syllables, what’s the problem? And yes, milk is cheaper here than the same quality in the US (despite our 12% VAT) so I don’t see why “cheaper” next to it would feel wrong… And don’t forget that we don’t get the crap “regular” gasoline with as low as 87 octane rating, the lowest widely available one is 95. Similarly, 75 % of milk drunk here is UHT-treated, as opposed to 10 % in the US.

          • Stez@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You don’t have much better gasoline there it’s just that you use a different unit for measuring the octane. They aren’t actually much different

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            because expensiveness is a scale that starts from 0 so you always know how expensive everything is. cheapness works the other way, so there’s no starting point. that means there’s no way to quantify how cheap the first thing is, in order to double that. in your example gasoline would have to be the least cheap thing possible, which means nothing can be more expensive.

            it’s like saying someone’s twice as short as someone else. half as tall makes sense, twice as short is a weird way to say it because how short is the first person?

            • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              “Cheaper” means “less expensive”. 2x cheaper means 2x less expensive, or less expensive by a factor of 2, or 0.5x as expensive. I can say 2x shorter, 2x slower etc. and I don’t see a problem. The adjectives “cheap” and “expensive” don’t relate to a number quantity called “expensiveness” or “cheapness” but “price” or “cost”, which is what the factor applies to, and the word specifies if it’s an increase or decrease. Everyone I know would understand that it’s the reciprocal of the original price, although I get that in a country whose president can say he slashed proces by 500 % without instantly having to resign, fractions and percentages might have to be specified but that’s longer to say for the same number of significant figures.

              Yes, I can find people debating “two times cheaper” (English) but not “zweimal billiger” (German) or “dvakrát levnější” (Czech), in fact the phrase is often used in promotional material. The only results suggesting it’s wrong are English Reddit discussions’ automatic translations to German or Czech, and Google’s AI summary that cotes them.

              I won’t stop using it just because people with inferior education sometimes don’t get it. Similarly, I provided the metric value and conversion rate, it’s Americans who need to practice mental math.

              • CriticalThought@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I won’t stop using it just because people with inferior education sometimes don’t get it.

                I doubt anyone doesn’t get it, it just sounds twice as unnatural to a native English speaker.

                • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Whatever, I’m not convincing anyone with my use of metric and username. I’m avoiding some other weird phrases though, for example you won’t usually see me type “14 days” in English although Czech speakers prefer it to “2 weeks” (idk why, it’s the same number of syllables).

    • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      1 day ago

      Oh wait till you find out about how modern cars are mining your data, including facial recognition and reporting of you are having sex in the car! And the best part it’s all unregulated! Govt can simply buy the info for tracking even your Phone would be jealous of!

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Very few of the ones around me have the built in ad players. Several stations blare ads (inevitably largely for themselves, curiously enough) over the PA system constantly, though.

        The ZIP code thing is for credit card verification. I ask for that too, when you pay me by credit card. I don’t have a choice unless I’d like to enjoy zero fraud and chargeback protection.

        • toynbee@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          The gas station nearest me has screens that show ads, but they’re just for that facility and they don’t have audio. However, the store does have a PA system constantly playing audio, a combination of music and ads.

          My favorite ad is the one that advertises themselves to advertisers. I don’t remember the exact wording, but it’s basically “want to advertise something? We’ve essentially got a captive audience and there are a lot of them!”

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        They don’t exist in my country, and to be frank, I’m shocked the ones in the US aren’t vandalised to hell and back by masked vigilantes at night.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Ohh that is a great idea. We can put different markers in different brands and then detect those markers in a customer’s breath to tell what brand they are using on the fly.

      Then when you develop cancer from exposure we can use this information to market other brands. After all, why would you use Shell gas if it gave you cancer when you could use Exxon instead.

  • M137@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    High fuel prices is a good thing and a 32" TV shouldn’t be that cheap.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It is when you offshore all your jobs and import from slave labor countries, all while using a currency that is able to be printed from thin air effectively taxing the world because it’s a reserve currency.

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      TVs are made from components that are made through almost entirely automated processes at such large scales that the underlying raw material and cost of shipping become the main driver of cost. Paradoxically, that means that TVs that have gotten thinner and lighter use less material and therefore have a lower floor of how little it can cost.

      Once a production line is set up to make the components, each additional one produced costs very little, so making high volume runs is the key: lots of shared parts between brands and models, very long production runs to minimize the cost of redesign or retooling or downtime.

    • timochka@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      TVs were always cheap compared to cost to make the things - it’s not just the “oh, they have advertising now” thing.

      Source: I worked in electronics retail in the late 80s/early 90s, and in one of the world’s largest consumer electronics firms when my career proper started.

      The TVs in the window of the local electronics chain store (or in Walmart) were sold at practically zero margin, or more often than not at a loss. The retail chains would basically hold a gun to the CE companies heads and tell them if you’re not willing to sell at a loss, nothing you make is going in the window display, or worst case we’re not selling you at all.

      The retail chains didn’t care because all their profit was in selling accessories and unnecessary extended warranties. The CE companies hoped that they could make it up by selling you the more expensive model they actually made a profit on once you were in the door, or by selling you a VCR or whatever as well.

      This is why the TV companies were always looking for a “next big thing” (flat-screen, ultraflat, widescreen, HD, 3D, 4k, 8k…) to differentiate the “next model up”, which is to say the model the store would actually allow them to make a profit on.

      This particular race-to-the-bottom mutually assured destruction business model is also the reason there is practically no consumer electronics manufacturing left in the West, of course. And why manufacturers grasp at stuff like advertising.

      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        TVs were always cheap compared to cost to make the things - it’s not just the “oh, they have advertising now” thing.

        Yes, and the cost of making them keeps dropping. When you were selling TVs in 1991, a 30 inch TV cost about $500 in 1991 dollars. The technology back then just basically made it complex and labor intensive to manufacture, and they were so heavy that it actually took significant number of human labor hours just to get it from factory to store to the specific store’s display. Merely putting a 30 inch TV in the window of a store was probably a 2-man lift.

        Whereas today it’s a bunch of robots in cleanrooms automating production of high volumes of solid state LCD components to where full color displays can be put in cheap appliances, and finished 30 inch TVs being thin and light enough to be moved with one hand while sipping a coffee with the other.

        I’m not surprised it’s much cheaper today, even a tiny fraction of the time period you’re talking about, even when back then they were selling at a loss.

        • timochka@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I try to always be nice to retail staff, because I remember well the sheer misery of having to stand sandwiched in a too-small window display cabinet, scraper in one hand and bottle of weak vinegar in the other, scraping the bloody advertising stickers off the glass (that were stuck on with a glue stronger than cement) with a roasting hot halogen floodlamp about 1" from your head, just because a new range has come in… Particularly soul-destroying if it’s that time of year when the same 5 royalty-free Christmas songs are on permanent loop in the background.

          And yeah, you make a very good point. Sheer size/weight and cost of shipping would have been a huge chunk of the price of those old TVs! Not to mention the cost of healthcare for all the staff who put their back out dragging the damned things to and from The Cage… ;)

    • sibannac@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Nearly all tvs are smart tvs that make money with showing ads and selling data. Any loss on the hardware is made up on selling customer data and ad space. The tvs would be amazing if they didn’t come with smart features.

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          2018 is about when it started but it was a very small number of tvs. By 2020 it was a common thing but it was a dedicated line of tvs from each brand. By 2024 it was all cheaper tvs basically. And now it’s basically every TV and even some monitors.

          The non smart TVs are almost as hard to find now as finding a smart one was in 2018. And monitors are starting to have smart features and ads even among the highest end offerings. But unlike tvs they arnt any cheaper for it. Its stupid.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Is there any way to lobotomize these smart TVs? Even the specs on a cheaper mid-range would blow my current dinosaur out of the water

        • toddestan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Not really, the smarts are integrated into the control circuitry. You can’t bypass them and turn them into simple, dumb displays.

          Depending on the model, you can block the TV from the internet and leave it on set to one of the inputs and the smarts bits won’t bother you again. Other ones are more intrusive and pushy about it.

        • Gormadt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Never connect them to the internet

          You want your favorite streaming service on there? Get an older (used office) PC, load it up with (your prefered flavor of) Linux, get a bluetooth keyboard mouse combo, hook it up to your HDMI port, and go ham.

          Some TVs even let you turn them on directly to a specific HDMI port for a bonus fun time of never having to see the TVs menu.

          • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Iv stared coming across some that’s not remotely an option. They require a logged in account before they accept any input.

            If you attempt to use a DNS ad blocker they also just stop working. Its fucking toxic.

          • stickly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            18 hours ago

            True, I’ll probably end up going that route when this one dies (assuming they don’t all require sign in and heartbeats at that point)

            Was hoping for something like a FOSS OS just for the convenience of keeping jellyfin up to date and cleaning up the useless baked in apps.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The build quality is not great, they saved on backlight heatsinking so the LEDs will bake and delaminate, causing dark spots, discoloration etc.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yea, TVs are all “Smart” now. But they don’t have any truly new or useful features, they just record your conversations and transmit occurrences of keywords as “usage and diagnostic” data. I guess now they can use wifi to do occupancy scans of your house too, so that’s fun. Oh and they use Bluetooth to scan for nearby devices that are willing to cooperate in case you don’t put them on the LAN and they transmit that way.

        Anyway, TNG has left Netflix. Can you fucking believe it?

      • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Telly is a TV you can pre-order, which is completely free but apparently pays for itself with all the ads it will display lol

      • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Norway exports far more than they use, and petrol prices there are among the highest in the world.

        • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That is a policy decision. In places like Saudi Arabia, gas is cheaper than water.

          Norway, correctly, invested more into public transit and EVs, and high gas prices encourage that.

          • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            In places like Saudi Arabia, gas is cheaper than water.

            Because it’s a fucking desert surrounded by salt water. Desalination is expensive.

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was a Planet Money episode that broke down where the $4/gallon went in 2022:

      $2.40 for the price of crude oil when priced at $100/barrel.

      $0.65 to the refiner that turns crude oil into gasoline (this was the prevailing spread in 2022, maybe different now).

      $0.184 in federal taxes

      $0.30 in state taxes

      $0.20 to $0.50 for transportation from the refiner to the actual retail station.

      Remainder is for the retailer (usually about $0.30 but fluctuates wildly).

      That’s how it is in the U.S. In other countries, it might be higher taxes, higher cost of refining, higher costs of transportation from the refiner, and higher margins for the retailer.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I filled up a family members Rav4 the other day. It was $96.

      Not exactly the best car, but hardly a gas guzzler. Or maybe it is, idk. I normally drive electric.

        • cheers_queers@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          i took a chance last year and bought a honda ruckus for daily driving. it pays for itself in the gas im saving, i spend abt 10 bucks a month for gas. i hope to upgrade to a real bike at some point but for now i will enjoy the 100mpg perk.

          can i ask what you ride, and the mpg?

          • 0ops@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            Honda ruckus hell yeah I love those things! Sv650 and I get 60mpg (edit wrong acronym)

          • Justifier@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I follow a lot of lawn care YouTubers

            More than a few commenting about raising prices and canceling contracts of customers not willing to pay enough to cover it

            Its not an insignificant difference either, like +$40 on a weekly cut for a quarter acre lot. That’s between a 35-50% price increase depending on the market of the people I’m watching

            The trucks to get there being the big portion of that increase not the mowers, but certainly the mower/trimmer/blower opex increased as well

            Regardless though anyone not running primary electric rigs are definitely hurting right now

            Those who invested into it early, and especially those who got State and Govt incentives, before the current administration shut them down have a massive opportunity to cash in over at least the next ~2 years while this settles, keeping their prices just below whatever their competitors have to charge until their routes are fully booked while those running gas are forced to raise prices and renegociate contracts to maintain profits

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Could be a labourer. I didn’t see much point in trucks and such before but now it makes sense for some to have them.

          • Sirius006@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I was refering at a tank as in “Main battle tank”.

            That being said, I have 2 kids and my car is (I just checked) 3.81 meters long. I’m not even sure cars of that size are still being sold in north America. What I’m sure of is that finding a convenient one of this size is becoming complicated in Europe, so my next one will probably be a tad bigger.

            Still, I don’t understand what so called trucks or SUV are for.