• Emerald (she/her)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I think I’d cum if I stepped into that 2000’s future. Place looks hella cool. 1950’s future just looks like car dependent AI slop and 1980’s future looks really bright and light polluting

  • Potzblitz3001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    (1953) The War of the Worlds

    (1966) Fahrenheit 451

    (1973) Soylent Green

    (1984) 1984

    (1999) Matrix

    (2004) Children of Men

    (2012) The Hunger Games

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    The 1970s and 80s sadly was the start of the apocalyptic shithole future. Look up cyberpunk. The 90s economic computer boom really lead to a lot of optimism, but that is long gone now.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Educated people saw the 2020 vision as far back as 1950s. They warned us many times, but we never listened.

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 hours ago

      “we”

      You mean the rich and powerful who could’ve solved the systemic environmental issues didn’t, who got it told directly all the time. Who could’ve done something against Exxon and the others. Don’t lump the masses together with such assholes.

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        There /is/ a large portion of the masses who are perfectly aligned with the goals of the rich and powerful and are happy to shit on their own doorstep for even a moment’s convenience

        • jve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Propaganda, indoctrination, and de-education, especially when applied over generations, are a hell of a force.

      • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I mean ‘we’ as everyone collectively, as society. It’s just manner of speaking. I wasn’t even alive for most of the time frame mentioned, so I’m perfectly aware not everyone was actually able to ‘listen’ to the warnings.

      • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I mean… people have been calling the apocalypse since ancient times. Because that’s reality. Every civilization falls, every society fails, and it’s often via war and violence. We simply have been able to become more connected and harm each other on larger scales over time.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          And when exactly did humanity ever had the power to destroy the planet prior to the industrial revolution?

          You’re just repeating one of the usual shit arguments climate deniers are spouting daily.

          • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            We still don’t have the ability to destroy the planet. We just will make it uninhabitable for the number of humans that are currently here, which has happened quite a lot in human history.

  • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Well, if we had risen up against the rich, instead of letting them rule the world at least the last image would have been avoided.

  • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Last time the wealth disparity before rich and poor was anywhere close to current one, we call it “medieval dark ages”.

    • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t worry, we were fucked since before you were born. We overshot our ecosystem long, long ago, it just takes decades for the consequences to catch up.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You’re just in the wrong country, aligned with the wrong set of politics, speaking the wrong language.

      The future isn’t American anymore. The future is Mexican and Brazilian. The future is African. The future is Chinese.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          The ability to endure it and survive - even thrive - in the face of it will vary heavily based on national leadership.

          • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I mean the ability to survive it will be based on where you are located. And for the billions that are unable to survive it, they will either start wars with those who can, or will die in the process, or both.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Or peacefully migrate to areas that are sustainable and contribute to the project of rebuilding.

              But, again, the capacity to build and supply life sustaining amenities and the political willingness to distribute them in order to curry political favor rather than just generate profit will be central to a country’s power projection into the late 21st century.

              • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 hours ago

                So where is that going to be? If the rest of the world doesn’t run that way (which isn’t possible), what do you think happens then? When sea rise lifts things a couple of meters, billions are displaced. You aren’t simply going to put them somewhere else. Europe currently is struggling with climate and war migrants, the US is the same.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  the rest of the world doesn’t run that way (which isn’t possible)

                  It is possible. And the bitter irony is that it would be better for everyone on average. Just not better for a few specific people on the whole.

                  When sea rise lifts things a couple of meters, billions are displaced.

                  Where will they run to? Not the US Gulf Coast or the Dutch flatlands. Not to the low lying Caribbean Islands or the coastline of Japan or Australia.

                  The most Climate Change friendly regions are going to be high altitude but still retain access to lots of potable water. Curiously enough, that looks like… Iran, Venezuela, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa.

                  All those Western yahoos screaming about illegal immigrants are on track to become ones. And right back to the countries they spent generations pissing off.

          • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tell that to the vast swathes of the globe, including China, due to face lethal wet bulb temperatures within the next 10-20 years. Which, along with mass death, means massive breadbasket failures on multiple fronts. Ain’t politicking our way out of this one, chief.

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, and someone was just arguing with me in a different thread saying vertical warehouse farming is stupid and we should just grow our crops in the ground outside 🙄

              Like, I’m trying to be helpful here, but sure let’s continue to make no systemic changes to the way things are done and just be frustrated when our problems only continue to get worse…

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              lethal wet bulb temperatures

              Europe wants to rebalance trade with Beijing, but can’t quit Chinese air conditioners

              One country is producing all of the world’s air conditioners. I wonder if they’re in a better position to endure wet-bulb temperatures than their peers.

              Ain’t politicking our way out of this one, chief.

              They absolutely can and will. This is a country that can build the infrastructure to keep people from dying of overheating. What’s more, this is the country that can export that infrastructure globally, such that its allies will see improved survivability. And that will have cascading knock-on effects.

              The ability to survive climate change is the ability to operate as a global center of gravity.

              • GelatinGeorge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I think you missed the ‘massive breadbasket failures’ part of my comment. You can’t air condition a field of rice. Well, you could, but good luck trying that on the scale needed to feed everyone once crops begin to fail globally.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                You do realize how many people in the world live in houses that aren’t even fully-enclosed, right? Usually in some of the places that will be most impacted by climate change, too. Air conditioners won’t be of much help to them.

                Also, do you know how much coal China burns each year?

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  many people in the world live in houses that aren’t even fully-enclosed, right?

                  It’s crazy that you treat this as an insurmountable obstacle. Much less that there’s no political cache in surmounting it.

              • j_overgrens@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Are we talking about the same country here? Where in “southern” provinces like Sichuan there is no heating provided in buildings? And people rely on electric heaters and blankets to stay warm?

          • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Kind of, I guess. Depends on if there any animals larger than a cat left after the temperature change stops and levels off.

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Depends if we can adapt them quickly enough to survive.

              Brazil has been dismantling our biotech sector for 20 years now, so I’m not optimist, but YMMV.

              Anyway, I’m more optimist on avoiding problem than on dealing with it.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              High temperatures don’t preclude large lifeforms. Just ask the dinosaurs.

              But you need the ability to adapt at speed and scale for the entire ecological colony. You can’t rely on biomes that cater exclusively to a handful of apex predators.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  The planet has been undergoing the 6th global extinction event in its history for over 30,000 years. During this time period, humanity has flourished even as millions of other species have died out.

          • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That, and natural resources. Idk how many freshwater lakes and rivers Mexico has but it’s not looking good for the ones they do have.

      • Photonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Doubtful. Climate change as well as its economic impact will affect most of these areas especially hard

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    i mean, this mostly applies to american mindset. “work hard” is a function of progress; in the absence of progress, it stops making sense. and people who only knew how to work hard their entire life suddenly see that way of life ending.

    there’s a lot of americans who think that way. “work hard and you can make it”. nah

    • osanna@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      a lot of people are realising that hard work != success. A lot of people are quiet quitting and other shit.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        i wish my personality let me do that. i’m kinda loud. i wrote a (bad) song about that stupid boss and played it at open mic night.

  • xxxb@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Understandable, but ysk that it is an illusion. You always think the past was better than it is now.

  • chellewalker@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That last example is from the original Fallout game, which came out in the late 90s, not the 2020s.

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean the rich are building bunkers so the bottom Fallout 1 death screen is appropriate if you know the lore of the vaults/bunkers.