I was thinking about the phrase ‘The pot calling the kettle black’. It comes from a time where cooking was done over open fires and cookware would become visibly ashy. (Fun fact: It first appears and was perhaps coined by Cervantes in Don Quixote!)

What are some other idioms that have lost their literal connection to time? What would be a good modern replacement?

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I think the outdated/obsolete nature of terms in many idioms is what makes them charming.

    It also makes it pretty clear you aren’t using them in a literal sense. If your idioms are too new/unfamiliar and your terminology is too modern/relevant then people might just think you’re being literal and not idiomatic.

  • blackshirt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 hours ago

    In my home country they say “Cheap as Onions” (eq in English : Cheap as Dirt)

    Looking at the prices on Onions nowadays …

  • Jonnyprophet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    A stitch in time saves nine.

    This refers to a time when clothes were hard to come by and often homemade. If they tore, a small tear could be fixed with one stitch of needle and thread, but if let go too long, it would take many more stitches to repair a bigger rip.

    Change your oil (or tires) in time, or change your car.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Eating a dead horse - not unless you buy the budget beef mince at Tesco

    Read like rabbits - rabbits can’t read or even hold books

    Nip it in the butt - that’s sexual assault, you’re not allowed to do that any more

    Get down off your high horse - you’re not allowed to get animals high either

    Kids should be shorn and not herd - goats have hair, not wool, and can’t be shorn. Their natural tendency to herd is a difficult behaviour to break.

    Under the weather - unless you’re a pilot you’re going to be under the weather most of the time

    A blessing in the skies - unless your bishop is a pilot too, that’s not going to happen.

    Fight off more than you can chew - I don’t know where to start with this one,

  • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, man, when it comes to nautical idioms, I could go on all day. There are so many, and they’ve lost their literal connections so thoroughly, you probably don’t even think of some of them as idioms. A few that occur to me immediately:

    • taken aback (wind on the wrong side of the sails)
    • give a wide berth (extra space for a vessel to maneuver)
    • leeway (unwanted downwind slippage of the vessel when in motion)
    • above board (on deck, the board being the section of the hull running fore and aft just above the water line)
    • onboard (to load onto the deck of the ship)
    • go by the board (to fall off of the ship into the water, passing the board on the way)
    • hand over fist (two-handed motion to pull in sails, ropes, etc. as quickly as possible)
    • high and dry (above the tide line)
    • loose cannon (a gun insufficiently secured would cause havoc on a warship when fired, or as the ship rolled in waves)

    Honestly, I’m not sure that I want modern equivalents, since many are so rich in imagery.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Honestly, I’m not sure that I want modern equivalents, since many are so rich in imagery.

      I do love the imagery of “loose Canon”, and by “love” I mean that as it’s been described and depicted, it’s a truly horrifying situation. So it makes for a really visceral image.

      A quick aside: there’s this murder mystery/logic puzzle game called “the Return of the Obra Dinn” that takes place on a merchant ship. The game is basically like a series of still frame dioramas that you have to analyze and figure out what’s going on. There’s a particularly striking scene with a cannon which breaks loose from its chains and several unfortunate sailors. It took me a long time to actually find the third sailor in the scene… (There wasn’t a lot left)

    • Dagobah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Very nice! Amazing how ingrained they’ve become. “That new recruit is a car without brakes” just doesn’t ring the same does it?

    • HamsterRage@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I thought “by the boards” referred to losing the mast specifically snapped off right at the deck.

  • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think it’s the char/open fire but rather that both pot a d kettle would be made of the same black cast iron

    • nwtreeoctopus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Alternatively, shiny kettle and the pot sees its own black reflection in it.

      (But yeah, I assumed they’re both black/cast iron)

  • SMillerNL@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Avoiding things like the plague” because people did not actually seem to want to avoid the plague last time around.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    All the horse ones because we don’t use horses anymore. There a ton of them.

    Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. Who tf gets a gift horse?

    Saddle up. Who tf has a saddle?

    Hold your horses. Who tf has horses to hold?

    Get off your high horse. Who tf has a high horse?

    Beat a dead horse. WTF.

    • trebach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. Don’t check the dipstick of a gifted car.

      They have the same meaning that you’re trying see if the horse is healthy and the car’s engine is in good condition.

    • ragas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      To update replace all with car.

      Dont look under the hood of a gift car.

      Buckle up.

      Hold your engine.

      Get out of your limousine.

      Turn the key on a drowned engine.

    • Dagobah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Great examples! ‘champing at the bit’ also comes to mind. I think cars fill in pretty nicely as a horse substitute. ‘Saddle up’ has ‘buckle up’. Hold your horses has ‘Hit your brakes’. As for gift horses… ‘Don’t look a gift car under the hood?’ Hmm doesn’t quite work

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          But presumably a gift horse is worth something as long as it walks. This summer my kid got a “gift car” and it was critical look at both the undercarriage and the resale value. Thank goodness he was only out the cost of a tow and mechanics inspection

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Quit horsing around. You’re really putting the cart before the horse.

      Edit: sorry, gotta go. I need to see a man about a horse.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. Who tf gets a gift horse?

      A buddy in college accidentally said “gifted horse“. Then his girlfriend said “very much so” and we never let him hear the end of it

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m sure there’s something there with e-scooters. Get off your segway max extreme and get down here. Don’t look at the speed regulator of a free scooter. Hold onto your brakes? Idk I’m just spitballing here

  • Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t put the cart before the horse.
    Don’t submit your post before you write it.

  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Have your cake and eat it too” doesn’t really make sense. Cake is not rare or expensive enough that simply possessing it feels good. If you have cake, all you want is to eat it.

    The italian version, “you want a full barrel and drunk wife” illustrates the same situation much more clearly.

    • hungprocess@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m only half joking when I say this could be the modern replacement. I’ve caught both myself and the S.O. using “no take only throw” in conversation, often about unreasonably demanding people.

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That’s because it’s backwards. Should be “eat your cake and have it too”

      Edit: While that preserves the form and is recognizable as the common saying, it makes the meaning clearer if phrased as “Eat your cake and still have it”.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also wanting to eat your cake and have it too is supposed to imply you’re like a toddler having a tantrum because you’re just coming to terms with the rules of object permanence: a person playing peekaboo or hide-and-seek can disappear and still come back, but if you eat your cake it will be ALL GONE!!!

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Even flipped, it’s still weird in English with “Having cake” meaning “Eating cake” in most contexts anyway.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      You cannot have a cake in your possession and also eat that cake. Once you eat it, it is gone.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      When I was a kid, I remember asking my mom about this phrase because it made no sense to me. Why in the world would one even want a cake if they weren’t going to eat it? What is the point?! (I have always been particularly fond of cake — eating it, that is — who cares if it’s pretty if it tastes good?)

    • mr_account@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I was confused by this one too, but then I thought about it in the context of a wedding cake; you want to have it as a beautiful thing to show off to all of your guests, but you also want everyone to enjoy how good it tastes as a desert. You can’t have both simultaneously, so you have to pick

  • Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not quite updating, but in my house we say “like sweeping the yard” to indicate that something is pointless and wasting time.

    “Boss has us doing obviously pointless busy work today”

    “Yeah, next he’ll be having us sweep the yard!”

    Or derogatorily:

    “I want you to go do that thing.”

    “Sure, you want me sweep the yard when I’m done?”