I never paid much attention to his debates, but from what little snippets I’ve seen, along with the “Prove Me Wrong” schtick seems to indicate he already decided he was right and others were wrong.
There’s plenty of rhetoric and memes already, I’d like to avoid more rhetoric and memes, and I ask this question with genuine curiosity and earnest desire for learning and understanding.
No, but he was rather conclusively proven wrong a couple days ago
He was never in it for personal growth he was in it for financial gains. He was a mere grifter, his opinions were for sale. There is a lot of money in right wing grifting when you reach his level of notoriety. His personal beliefs conveniently always pointed in the direction of money. Worth about $12m when he was executed. He believed in his bank accounts.
I am also interested in this.
I guess that most people wouldn’t really know, because who with a sound mind would like to spend time listening to garbage being produced by right wing grifters. Most of us just assume they are trolls and cannot have their minds changed, and we are right in this assumption most of the time, I would say.
The only right wing person I have ever heard to actually question his own beliefs is Jordan Peterson during the Žižek debate. That’s it. And it is probably because Peterson isn’t really a troll or a grifter, he is just endlessly confused and ignorant and angry. I can’t think of a single other case. And I would assume the same goes for Kirk. Everything I have ever heard about this guy is absolutely abominable.
he changes it whatever suits him at the moment, much like what the other right grifters do.
No. He operates as an Evangelical Apologist does. He makes arguments that sound logical and convincing enough, as long as you don’t think about or look into them that much.
I think at
StamfordCambridge recently his whole argument against gay marriage was completely torn down, and he finally just said, he simply didn’t like it. I’ll look for the video.He changed his mind to agree with Catholics about the Blessed Virgin Mary. That’s rare for an Evangelical.
So he supported the false intercessor in Mary? That sounds like worshiping the Image of the Beast (the idols the Pope set up) if you ask me.
Do you want a 30 years argument, bringing this up is how you get that
Yeah, this only leads to troubles.
If Christians would go back to crusading against each other like the fourth crusade, the rest of us could maybe have some peace.
yeah too busy crusading against the middle east these days. evangelical interference keeps bibi in power.
Thanks for answering the question properly.
By “properly” you seem to mean “giving me the answer I wanted even if it’s wrong, without any evidence to support it”.
“properly” meaning avoiding meme answers and rhetoric like many other commenters have done, i.e.:
- Once and the message stuck with him for the rest of his life.
- Who cares? He’s dead now.
- I heard he started leaning left shortly before his death.
Lying isn’t any different to using a meme.
Lying isn’t the issue here. “He’s dead, who cares?” does absolutely nothing to answer my question.
Jokes about his death (leaning left, “once for the rest of his life”) does absolutely nothing to answer my question.
But lying does something to answer your question?
I asked for any times Charlie has had his mind changed after debating. Instead, certain individuals have done anything but that.
Okay, what’s the truth then? Cite your evidence.
The best thing that could possibly come of his death is if nobody ever spoke of him or thought of him again. These people’s power is entirely derived from people talking about them. If it continues long past their death, they may as well be immortal.
The funny thing is, he will be completely forgotten in a month, even by his putative supporters.
Who’s going around sad that Rush Limbaugh is dead?
He’s just useful to their sadistic cause. That’s it. No one is even sad that Charlie’s dead — but they are absolutely gleeful at the idea of attacking anyone left of Reagan in “revenge.”
Give us a week or two to enjoy the schadenfreude first
Fair, fair
Sounds like the reverse is happening instead, no?
Once and the message stuck with him for the rest of his life.
Can you provide a reference, please?
.30-06
that’s a lotta damage
I fail to see how that’s changing his views on a subject during a debate. I already knew he had been killed.
Well at the end of it, you can see he actually starts leaning pretty far to the left
💀
(this joke is so dumb, yet I LOLed at it 🤣, thanks for the chuckle)
Ok, so in all seriousness, he doesn’t “debate” in the classical sense of two parties entering a forum with good intentions and open minds. Kirk’s brand of “debate” was getting selectively edited viral clips of flustered college students who couldn’t come up with a coherent response to the bullshit he spat out. He never changed his mind (and would never) because that would make him look weak, and that’s not what his brand of “debate” is about — it’s about winning at any cost and making people look dumb for the views.
The tent says “change my mind”
Someone decided to do it at 3000 fps
Less of a mind change, and more of a mind drain…
A political debate is intended to convince voters that your policies are the right decision. Not that they are correct in a factual sense.
Who cares? He’s dead now.
I heard he started leaning left shortly before his death.
Has any social media debate changed anyone’s mind?
I doubt it. I’m in a group with 3 MAGAts, a British incel and 26 liberals and despite having access to sources through this group for the past 15 years, they still vote Trump (and love Kirk).
Why are you even on here if it hasn’t?
I used to believe people were rational, now I know they are all trash.
Yes. I used to be extremely pacifist.
Yes. Mine.
ive changed my mind from social media debate, but I’m not going to give someone the satisfaction of knowing they convinced me.
Yeah, engaging with people in the comments has certainly influenced my opinion, many times. Daily probably.
It’s not impossible.
Not if it’s rubbing someone’s face in it
He started noticing what the Israeli government was doing, and talked about it on the likes of Megyn Kelly’s show, Tucker Carlson’s show, and some others. This happened despite him being a staunch advocate for what was happening in Palestine (and the people thereof dying at the hands of the fake Khazar Jews, of which I’m a partial Khazar who doesn’t practice an Abrahamic religion). Let’s also mention the fact he was Calvary Chappel, and that he took the Mark of the Beast on the right hand (he obeyed the Pope, despite not being Catholic, though following what Rome’s bishop wanted). Not to mention too, while it’s absolutely abhorrent what happened to him, he had some views that would’ve gotten him sent to the lake of fire anyway (due to taking the Mark as I described).
This is all despite the fact he engaged in Socratic debate.
All of these right-wing grifters are susceptible to Zeitgeist shifts as they are paid for the reach of their propaganda so when it became untenable to defend Israel even to a right-wing audience Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly and Charlie Kirk pivoted. Ben Shapiro didn’t and lost his audience.
What do you mean obeyed the Pope? You realize I’ve of his last actions was to donate the popemobile as an aid vehicle for Gaza
If he was really going to do it, it wouldn’t be a Popemobile, as Unum Sanctum would be enforced on the Palestinians. They happened to be of the line of Jacob… not the Khazars as claimed by the mainstream.
I’m sorry, what time period do you think we live in exactly?
Fascinating answer, thank you.
My producer (Neigsendoig, a.k.a. Sendo) and I had done some cursory numerology on it as well (we’re both numerologists by hobby), and our souls felt like they sank to the bottom of the ocean once we realized who planned it out.
I’d be happy to DM that if you’re interested.
I’m going to hold your hand while I say this, and I mean it with all love and sincerity. Have you been to a doctor recently? You sound schizophrenic.
wut
this sounds like the beginning of an ARG lol
He did yesterday
