• MithranArkanere@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 hour ago

    As always, the first computers you should check when anyone tries to ban consensual porn that harms no one, are the computers of the ones proposing the ban.

  • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    37 minutes ago

    MPs, of all people, have no fuckin right to act all holy about porn. They are depraved weirdos, the whole scabby bunch.

    Just reminded me of this incident - it’s a Tory, not labour, and many will be too young to remember, but I recall it being funny as fuck. The article neglects to mention that he was hanging in a cupboard and also had an orange full of poppers in his gob.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/february/8/newsid_2538000/2538165.stm

    There are many, many more recent stories of debauchery amongst the bunch of wankers who rule over us, but I felt this one exemplifies the lot

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Step-incest pornography and that which depicts performers as children is abhorrent.
    Alongside banning strangulation in pornography which the government previously announced, tackling this vile content will make our country a safer place for women and children and shows the UK can lead the world in tackling violence against women and girls

    That’s it folks, step incest is violence against women and girls. Next up, in order to further protect them, they’ll be prohibited from going outside without a man by their side.

    Whoever asked “What’s next, BDSM?” - guess what

    The government has already made porn that shows women being choked illegal, after a review found videos like these had helped normalise it in real life.

    The only silver lining in this whole thing is still only in “planning”

    Ministers are also planning to make tech bosses personally liable if their platforms do not remove intimate pictures of people that are posted without consent.

  • Jollyllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is the hill they die on? This is the issue they threaten to revolt for? Not properly funding the NHS or something else that benefits people?

  • brownsugga@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This is the dumbest thing I’ve heard today (I have not yet checked in on T—p and it’s only 8:30)

    Meanwhile the global elite are eating children… best ol Kier can do is ban incest porn?? what? Lol good luck buddy

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why is your political class in the UK even discussing such nonsense? If no harm is done, let people jack off to whatever they please.

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The Labour Party has some Methodist roots (possibly more than Socialist) and has long included a petty-authoritarian faction. Starmer and Shabana Mahmood are very much of that tendency. See also bans on anti-genocide protests, the failed-yet-again ID card scheme, cruel treatment towards asylum seekers and trans people, continuing opposition towards soft-drug decriminalisation, and upholding previous age-verification and porn bans.

      It’s idiotic because Labour’s chances of seizing the curtain-twitcher vote from Labour and Reform are next to nil.

      But I suppose Starmer’s too afraid to stand up to Trump, so there needs to be some kind of “think of the children” displacement activity to stay in the press.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      in history? not sure, delivery/service man was on top for a LONG time

    • moakley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Personally I’d say it’s the hero being an orphaned “chosen one”, or maybe the damsel in distress trope. But maybe it depends on what kind of media you consume.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    What about NOT step family member fucking NOT step family member porn? 😉 😉

    (EDIT: I make jokes about common porn tropes, but after reading the article, it sounds as though it’s aimed specifically at step family porn has an underage/child role-playing element)

    • YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No! They have to be married! Porn with unmarried actors is unethical as it degrades the values of a true Christian marriage. Also no role playing or make belief allowed