• baconsunday@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    My face when someone asks if I have watched Game Of Thrones (which hearing about it is the extend of the knowledge I have).

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Maybe it’s just nostalgia talking but I feel the Inbetweeners and Fresh Meat still hold up. The former one especially, if anyone wants to know what it was like growing up as a British teen in the '00s it’s basically 100% accurate.

  • dimmuborgnine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s not for everybody and it’s certainly not nuanced or pointed humor at all, but it’s funny and it holds up.

    • dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I disagree. I grew up watching reruns and I liked it. Recently I tried watching it, and the jokes did not hold up. I’d argue that Seinfeld and Fraiser held up better. But to each their own.

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Some episodes have aged excellently. That one where Phoebe dates a cop, who is definitely giving off white supremacist vibes, and Chandler is going around at every opportunity reminding everyone in absolute terror: “he has a gun!”

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Me with Big Bang Theory.

    I genuinely don’t understand why anyone likes it. Every moment is pure torture to me. Humor is subjective, sure. But I just don’t get it.

  • JAPHacake@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In the late 90’s UK it was a huge show, everyone really liked it, it was one of the first binge serials I can remember. I’ve not watched it for 25 years, maybe worth revisiting, although reading through the comments, seems it hasn’t aged well. It’s always sunny in Philadelphia is probably a better re-watch these days, it’s like extreme (anti) Friends on crack.

    • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Rewatched over the COVID period. Was still entertaining. The pacing is odd though when you binch watch, their relationships / life events last a few episodes (so it seems like only a few days have passed), whereas when it was a weekly event it seemed like they lasted months.

  • topperharlie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Honestly, I love friends, but I would never recommend it to younger audiences.

    Humour is a very personal choice, and like colors, not everything being fun for the same people. On top of that, A TON of today’s humour descends from friends, so the jokes feel dated and simple, but they were the literal origin of many tropes, at the time it was perfection, like a chewing gum.

    And most importantly, nowadays people (specially chronically online people) can’t just sit back and relax, they are always being judgemental little pricks to feel superior to everyone else, while not even trying to contextualise the time when what they are seeing was made.

    Not to mention how sad it is that all the media, no matter the genre, have to pass their stupid moral compass (whether the progressive one or the conservative one). The whole sit back, relax and have a laugh is lost to them.

    Is a very sad reality of hyper judgement they lived in, probably fueled by the cancer that is social media. I’m sad for them, they keep chasing the internet points thinking it will make them happy somehow, they don’t just watch something, they keep filling the checklist to then “have something to say”.

    I’m so happy the internet was not a thing when I was growing up, what a brain worm I dodged, just in time to enjoy it as an adult as well. I’m really sorry for the young people today.

    • youngskywalker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Very interesting take I never thought about that at all. What about just what you consider “good” or “bad”? You think it’s better to watch whatever is in front of you/ available and have no criticism for it ? I’m most critical of media I enjoy most but not in a judgement social media way you are picturing

      • topperharlie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        as always there is nuanced to everything, if I see a comedy or horror I’m not going to hold it to the same standards as a drama that is trying to convey a message, there will be a limit if it goes against my values in a crazy way, and I’ll stop watching it, but my main mentality is not there, I don’t watch it from a “defensive” position, so my alarms don’t go off as easily as other people’s, and I assume more good intent by default, which allows me to enjoy more of them, even if they “make fun” of my way of thinking or morals.

        Being able to laugh about yourself or your beliefs without thinking you are “helping the other side win” in some kind of imaginary online culture war is quite healthy actually.

        • youngskywalker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I was talking about objectivity and whether media is good in a sense of writing, execution and delivery. I will always give something the benefit of the doubt like you said, give something a try because you obviously never seen it. But why watch something that is clearly low effort and poorly thought out or planned? All that seems like an attention/ cash grab especially ones that try to appeal to a specific moral audience while disregarding any other viewers. My example is any show aimed at a straight white male that is very obviously disregarding any possible other viewer I consider poor writing and not well thought out.

          • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            My example is any show aimed at a straight white male that is very obviously disregarding any possible other viewer I consider poor writing and not well thought out.

            This seems a bit reductionist, though I guess it depends on what you mean by “disregarding any possible other viewer”. Any examples?

            If you mean racism and sexism, then that’s obviously bad. But I don’t see anything inherently wrong with having a target demographic

            • youngskywalker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              36 seconds ago

              I think you are reading into it too much, a show, like friends that is very simply written for one target demographic means it is not very good. That’s all . I consider this a bad show that isn’t very funny. Instead of accepting it because everyone I know likes it or it’s on cable television.

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      If I can’t comment on, upvote, downvote, report, share, like and subscribe to and article or piece of art, then what’s the point of me experiencing it at all?

      • Bourff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The emotions that it makes you feel are yours, they’re valid on their own even if you don’t share them with the world.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It was sorta funny back then, at the time we didn’t have nearly as much selection of niche stuff as we do now. If you stayed up late you could catch Beavis and Butthead and that was about it.

    It was the thing you watched with your parents.

    Now it just comes across like it’s a cleaned up comment section of a mainstream social media site. The stuff they hope to portray themselves as.

  • Ertain@mast.linuxgamecast.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    @titty_wizard I didn’t like Friends when it was on the air, and I’ve never liked it. There are millions of people who like it, and that’s fine. But I don’t relate to the characters, and the plot lines for the episodes sounded dumb to me.

    When I watched Friends, though, I didn’t think that I looked like Imhotep.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    If you go in with the predisposition that it won’t be funny, then of course it won’t be. Go watch something else.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The worst part of Big Bang Theory is how bad it makes you feel when people you know recommend it to you.

      “What kind of person do you think I am, exactly? And who do you think this show is for?”

    • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      ugh I really like that show, it’s one of my comfort shows, and I really like the extended Big Bang Universe. It’s sad the show gets such a bad rap but it’s also not entirely unwarranted. The characters do feel really fleshed out, like they’re actual people who are the result of their life experiences. But if you can’t stand the way that Sheldon is, or the laugh track, or any combination thereof, the show really is impenetrable.
      And annoyingly Young Sheldon goes on to be a really amazing prequel, but you need to watch and enjoy BBT first to get the most out of YS.
      Honestly I hated BBT for the longest time too. Only a few years ago could I actually get into it.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Hating on big bang theory is how you signal your superiority online, it’s the same on lemmy as it was on reddit. Liking big bang (or friends, or…) is for normies, and sheep, and people here are /r/verysmart.

        For what it’s worth I also enjoyed it, and sometimes put on a random episode (just like with friends). Haven’t seen young Sheldon tho, I don’t like prequels for some reason (same as better call Saul).

        • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Fair. YS really is to BBT what BCS is to BB. So if you already don’t like BCS then YS is a hard sell.
          Do keep an eye out for Stuart Fails to Save the Universe tho. Sci-fi sequel to BBT, sadly weekly episodes but quite enjoyable from the 2 episodes I’ve watched.

    • andyburke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      You don’t like watching nerdface performances played for derisive laughter?!

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        But I actually do like that - it just needs to be IT Crowd or Office Space or Silicon Valley or literally anything is fucking better than BBT gah.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          There’s a difference between made for nerds and nerdface.

          You can tell BBT was not made for nerds, because all the supposed nerd in-jokes get trampled into ground in the service of explaining them to normies.

          The one episode I saw had them refer to The One Ring as “a Lord of the Rings ring”, and then had them quote the inscription in English rather than the original Black Speech… you can almost hear some dickhead in the writers’ room saying “I don’t think the audience are going to know what that is, you need to make it clear”. You don’t see the IT Crowd explaining to the audience why Windows Vista is bad or what any of the posters in the set mean.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            IT crowd did have that one gag where the character said he’s putting this fire with the rest of the fire when that should be a self-explanatory step when sorting out a fire. You have to sort it before you can out it (for any lost non-nerds that somehow ended up in here).

        • AmyAye@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s the thing. IT Crowd or Office Space etc, ask youto laugh at the action because they are absurd, not laugh at the people. Thats why TBBT is so bad.

        • Anarki_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I want to watch IT Crowd but anything with laugh tracks loses me immediately :/

          Is there a tool for removing laugh tracks on shows that are good but need to tell you when they did a funny?

          • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Like most British TV comedy series, it was recorded with a live studio audience, rather than a “laugh track” added later - so there’s probably no versions that exist without it.

            There’s a chance that it’s a 5:1 mix rather than stereo, and might have the audience on a different channel to the main dialogue - which would then be fairly easily to remove in something like Audacity.

            Otherwise your options are turning the sound off and reading text subtitles, or using an “llm-powered” vocal remover.

            • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Not to mention how awkward laugh track comedies usually are when you get rid of the laughter, with everyone just standing in silence for a few seconds any time something funny happens.

              • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                That’s why you get about twenty retirees and sit them in front of your tv. Then you tickle them with a feather duster when you want them to laugh, that way you have your own live studio audience. Just remember to press record on the camera you’re filming the tv with

          • OwOarchist@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Would not recommend. If you’ve seen shows like that with the laugh tracks removed, they’re dreadful. Full of dead pauses while the characters wait between their lines for the laughs to end.

            Fun fact: a half hour comedy script is 22 pages (22 minutes of content, after the ad breaks). But a half hour comedy script for a show with laugh tracks is 11 pages, 11 minutes. Literally half the show’s runtime is taken up by laugh tracks.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              There’s a sad set of shows from before I got tired of laugh tracks. Sad because they are harder to enjoy now that I understand the laugh track is pretty much just there to dumb down the humour.

              Though that could be an interesting remake formula: take some existing show then redo it but without a laugh track or live audience. I hated how live audience shows needed a pause after each main character’s first appearance while the people present did the whole “scream because you see a new celebrity”.

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I’m about to blow your mind: the IT Crowd has a live studio audience. One of the specials goes over each cast member and shows bloopers and such, and you can see them in several shots. I believe they also talk briefly about the audience, though it’s been a while. If I remember right, they would take the audience reactions of two takes and sort of merge them together.

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Can’t recommend anything I’m afraid. But I will warn - I’ve seen edits that remove the laughing from I think it was Friends? It really ratchets the awkwardness to 200% with all the actors pausing for silence, I’m not sure what’s worse.

          • bluemite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I don’t understand the struggle some people have with laugh tracks. You can just use your own judgement and decide for yourself if you find the things funny or not.

            • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Not sure about others, but for me if the comedy is largely unfunny I find the laugh track to reflect an overscaled and nonsensical appreciation of this comedy which is somewhat grating. It makes the whole scene dumber to a varying degree.

              On the other hand, if the comedy is good I can very easily overlook a laugh track as it paces the laughter more closely which seems to bother me far less.

              [audience murmurs]

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Hm, only other coming to mind is Mythic Quest, maybe. I don’t think it reaches the same heights of funny but still balances around nerd culture. I also have a sweet spot for Superstore but that might just stem from my time in retail.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I know nerds who love the show. Well, they’re people who made being a nerdconsuming pop culture their whole personality. Not terribly great at analyzing said media though.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Ungh I had some professor give me a bad grade on a paper for ripping to shreds the portrayal of specific characters (it was entirely appropriate for the class). They were like “maybe you just don’t understand, its supposed to be kinda offensive, but these are great representations of (thing)!”

          BBT, turns out, was prof’s favorite show, like you said, their personality.

          No. Absolutely no. In fact, quite the opposite of good portrayals. I lost all respect for their opinions or teaching credentials, as both are clearly worthless.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            What’s annoying about the ones I know is that they’re holier than thou “woke” types that like to remind you about how problematic your media is, but have huge blind spots for the things they like. How do they not pick up on the issues with BBT?

    • obnomus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I didn’t watch The Big Bang Theory but I’ll recommend Young Sheldon, funny and good story.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      friends, big bang theory, two and a half men then you switch the channel to find reskin 3737267 of the same old boring ass police show

      stuff like this running all the time is why i stopped watching tv ages ago

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        OMFG cop procedurals. My parents watched so many of those fucking things that I sarcastically wrote an episode of one. Turns out that Federal Agent With Speaking Role IS Mr. Diddit.

    • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I refuse to watch that shit and know the spin off is garbage because my Maga loving dad loves that show.

  • TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s the funniest show on earth, I don’t think it’s even an amazing show, but it has its moments. Pretending otherwise for internet points is cringe.

  • TheRealKuni@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I liked Friends. It hasn’t aged particularly well, it’s not without its flaws, but it was popular for a reason.

    More importantly, its success meant NBC continued to invest heavily in comedies, which gave us a golden age of much better shows. A golden age that eventually included Scrubs, 30 Rock, The Office, My Name is Earl, Parks and Rec, Community, etc.

    • TedZanzibar@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah exactly this. A lot of the humour feels very dated today, even occasionally crossing the line into offensive, but at the time it was essential viewing. There’s a reason they were the most highly paid actors in TV comedy for a while (or TV in general?), later to be pipped by the cast of Frasier IIRC.

      Speaking of Frasier, unlike its star, that has aged pretty well IMO, and I would still recommend it.